Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20512572›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2010

[11C]Choline as pharmacodynamic marker for therapy response assessment in a prostate cancer xenograft model.

Bernd J Krause, Michael Souvatzoglou, Ken Herrmann, Axel W Weber, Tibor Schuster, Andreas K Buck, Roman Nawroth, Gregor Weirich, Uwe Treiber, Hans-Jürgen Wester and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Utility ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2017
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Glucose metabolism in gastric cancer: The cutting-edge.World journal of gastroenterology · 2016
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bernd J KrauseDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str 22, 81675 München, Munich, Germany. Bernd-Joachim.Krause@tum.de
Michael Souvatzoglou
Ken Herrmann
Axel W Weber
Tibor Schuster
Andreas K Buck
Roman Nawroth
Gregor Weirich
Uwe Treiber
Hans-Jürgen Wester
Sibylle I Ziegler
Reingard Senekowitsch-Schmidtke
Markus Schwaiger
TUM Klinikum · DETechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose[(11)C]Choline has been established as a PET tracer for imaging prostate cancer. The aim of this study was to determine whether [(11)C]choline can be used for monitoring the effects of therapy in a prostate cancer mouse xenograft model.

methodsThe androgen-independent human prostate cancer cell line PC-3 was implanted subcutaneously into the flanks of 13 NMRI (nu/nu) mice. All mice were injected 4-6 weeks after xenograft implantation with 37 MBq [(11)C]choline via a tail vein. Dynamic imaging was performed for 60 min with a small-animal PET/CT scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions). Six mice were subsequently injected intravenously with docetaxel twice (days 1 and 5) at a dose of 3 mg/kg body weight. Seven mice were treated with PBS as a control. [(11)C]Choline imaging was performed prior to and 1, 2 and 3 weeks after treatment. To determine choline uptake the images were analysed in terms of tumour-to-muscle (T/M) ratios. Every week the size of the implanted tumour was determined with a sliding calliper.

resultsThe PC-3 tumours could be visualized by [(11)C]choline PET. Before treatment the T/M(mean) ratio was 1.6+/-0.5 in the control group and 1.8+/-0.4 in the docetaxel-treated group (p=0.65). There was a reduction in the mean [(11)C]choline uptake after docetaxel treatment as early as 1 week after initiation of therapy (T/M ratio 1.8+/-0.4 before treatment, 0.9+/-0.3 after 1 week, 1.1+/-0.3 after 2 weeks and 0.8+/-0.2 after 3 weeks). There were no decrease in [(11)C]choline uptake in the control group following treatment (T/M ratio 1.6+/-0.5 before treatment, 1.7+/-0.4 after 1 week, 1.8+/-0.7 after 2 weeks and 1.7+/-0.4 after 3 weeks). For analysis of the dynamic data, a generalized estimation equation model revealed a significant decrease in the T/M(dyn) ratios 1 week after docetaxel treatment, and the ratio remained at that level through week 3 (mean change -0.93+/-0.24, p<0.001, after 1 week; -0.78+/-0.21, p<0.001, after 2 weeks; -1.08+/-0.26, p<0.001, after 3 weeks). In the control group there was no significant decrease in the T/M(dyn) ratios (mean change 0.085+/-0.39, p=0.83, after 1 week; 0.31+/-0.48, p=0.52, after 2 weeks; 0.11+/-0.30, p=0.72, after 3 weeks). Metabolic changes occurred 1 week after therapy and preceded morphological changes of tumour size during therapy.

conclusionOur results demonstrate that [(11)C]choline has the potential for use in the early monitoring of the therapeutic effect of docetaxel in a prostate cancer xenograft animal model. The results also indicate that PET with radioactively labelled choline derivatives might be a useful tool for monitoring responses to taxane-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced prostate cancer.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCholineXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAnimalsCarbon RadioisotopesCell Line, TumorDocetaxelHumansMaleMicePositron-Emission TomographyProstatic NeoplasmsTaxoidsTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeTumor BurdenBiomarkers, TumorCarbon RadioisotopesCholineDocetaxelTaxoids

Identifiers

PMID20512572
OpenAlexW169531913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.