Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20512426›Full record

ArticleIn vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal2010

Tissue culture: the unlimited potential.

Gordon H Sato, J Denry Sato, Tetsuji Okamoto, Wallace L McKeehan, David W Barnes

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Genomic Deletion ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gordon H SatoThe Manzanar Project Foundation, 27 Cedar St., Wenham, MA 01984, USA. manzanarmangrove@hotmail.com
J Denry Sato
Tetsuji Okamoto
Wallace L McKeehan
David W Barnes

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lack of tissue-specific differentiated functions of cells in tissue culture, once thought to be due to "dedifferentiation", was shown to be due to selective overgrowth of fibroblasts by a series of simple experiments that challenged the prevailing dogma. Following this insight, enrichment culture techniques (alternate animal and culture passage) were designed to give functionally differentiated tumor cells selective advantage over the fibroblasts. These experiments resulted in the derivation of a large number of functionally differentiated clonal strains of a range of cell types, providing the final point of destruction of the dogma of "dedifferentiation." Instead, the hypothesis was proposed that cells in culture accurately represent cells in vivo, but without the complex in vivo environment. With the development of hormonally defined media and its combination with functionally differentiated clonal cell lines, this concept has been strengthened and the potential of tissue culture studies has been greatly augmented. Hormonally defined media allow the culture of cell types that cannot be grown in conventional, serum-supplemented media. These approaches demonstrate that hormonal responses and dependencies can be discovered in culture. Following this thinking and the discovery of hormonal dependencies of cancer cells has led to a new rationale for therapy. Tissue culture and cell technology continue to play an important role in solving human health problems.

Indexed as

3T3 CellsAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell Line, TransformedCell ProliferationCulture Media, Serum-FreeFibroblastsHumansIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMiceTissue Culture TechniquesCulture Media, Serum-FreeIntercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.