ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2010
Transcriptomic and phenotypic responses of Listeria monocytogenes strains possessing different growth efficiencies under acidic conditions.
Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transcriptome analysis suggests the cell wall as the primary target of the antilisterial effect of carrots.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Adaptive Tolerance of Listeria monocytogenes to Chemical Oxidants: Comparative Analysis of Transcriptomic Studies.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2025Review
- Integrative analysis of transcriptomic and immunoproteomic data reveals stress response mechanisms inHeliyon · 2024Article
- Metabolic reprogramming in the food-borne pathogen Listeria monocytogenes as a critical defence against acid stress.FEMS microbiology letters · 2024Review
- Stress Adaptation Responses of aFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Acid stress signals are integrated into the σB-dependent general stress response pathway via the stressosome in the food-borne pathogen Listeria monocytogenes.PLoS pathogens · 2022Article
- Investigating Transcriptomic Induction of Resistance and/or Virulence inFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Adaptive Response ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Review
- Comparative Review of the Responses ofGenes · 2020Review
- Global Transcriptional Response of Three Highly Acid-Tolerant Field Strains ofMicroorganisms · 2019Article
- Variable Carbon Source Utilization, Stress Resistance, and Virulence Profiles AmongFrontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
- HowFrontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
- The Role of Stress and Stress Adaptations in Determining the Fate of the Bacterial PathogenFrontiers in microbiology · 2016Review
- VirR-Mediated Resistance of Listeria monocytogenes against Food Antimicrobials and Cross-Protection Induced by Exposure to Organic Acid Salts.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2015Article
- Acid shock of Listeria monocytogenes at low environmental temperatures induces prfA, epithelial cell invasion, and lethality towards Caenorhabditis elegans.BMC genomics · 2013Article
- Article
- Regulation of bacterial pathogenesis by intestinal short-chain Fatty acids.Advances in applied microbiology · 2013Review
- The transcriptional response of Listeria monocytogenes during adaptation to growth on lactate and diacetate includes synergistic changes that increase fermentative acetoin production.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In an experiment delineating aciduric strains, food and clinical Listeria monocytogenes isolates tended to produce the most biomass whereas ovine and avian strains produced comparatively less biomass when exposed to high levels of sodium diacetate (SD) and potassium sorbate. Compared to reference strains that exhibited greater acid sensitivity, representative food isolates with comparatively good growth capacities in the presence of 21 mM SD at pH 5.0 accumulated reduced levels of acetate anion and K(+) ion. The aciduric nature of SD-resistant strains was also reflected by comparatively high tolerance to pH 2.4 (HCl) acid challenges, a property boosted by the presence of SD. Exposure to elevated levels of SD (21 mM SD at pH 5.0) was found to have broad effects on gene expression, as differentiated from effects caused by mildly acidic conditions (pH 5.0). SD-resistant strain FW04/0025 was more responsive to elevated SD, increasing the expression of 222 genes (>2-fold change [P < 0.05]), compared to the more sensitive EGD reference strain, which exhibited increases in expression of 112 genes. Key differences between the strains in relation to SD-enhanced transcripts were notably associated with the cell envelope, oxidative stress management, and intermediary metabolism. SD thus appears to differentially influence growth efficiency and survival of strains, under conditions relevant to acidic foods, that could be due to altered cell wall and metabolic phenotypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.