ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2010
Patient and parent views on a Web 2.0 Diabetes Portal--the management tool, the generator, and the gatekeeper: qualitative study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Barriers to patient, provider, and caregiver adoption and use of electronic personal health records in chronic care: a systematic review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2020Pooled it
- Usability of Health Information Websites Designed for Adolescents: Systematic Review, Neurodevelopmental Model, and Design Brief.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Pooled it
- "Friending" teens: systematic review of social media in adolescent and young adult health care.Journal of medical Internet research · 2015Pooled it
- A systematic review of the use and effectiveness of social media in child health.BMC pediatrics · 2014Pooled it
- A new dimension of health care: systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication.Journal of medical Internet research · 2013Pooled it
- Patient web portals to improve diabetes outcomes: a systematic review.Current diabetes reports · 2010Pooled it
- Use of a web 2.0 portal to improve education and communication in young patients with families: randomized controlled trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2013Trial
- The effects of combining Web-based eHealth with telephone nurse case management for pediatric asthma control: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2012Trial
- Adherence challenges to therapeutic footwear among high risk diabetic foot populations in urban Southwest China.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Web-Based Learning for Children in Pediatric Care: Qualitative Study Assessing Educational Challenges.JMIR perioperative medicine · 2018Article
- Experiences and Opinions of Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Regarding a Self-Regulation-Based eHealth Intervention Targeting Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018Article
- Ecuadorian Cancer Patients' Preference for Information and Communication Technologies: Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2018Article
- Digital Clinical Communication for Families and Caregivers of Children or Young People With Short- or Long-Term Conditions: Rapid Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2018Review
- Patients with heart failure as co-designers of an educational website: implications for medical education.International journal of medical education · 2017Article
- Changing Needs for Information and Support in an Online System for Parents of Children With Kidney Disease.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2017Article
- The Unintended Consequences of Social Media in Healthcare: New Problems and New Solutions.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2016Review
- The Impact of an eHealth Portal on Health Care Professionals' Interaction with Patients: Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2015Article
- The Role of Social Network Technologies in Online Health Promotion: A Narrative Review of Theoretical and Empirical Factors Influencing Intervention Effectiveness.Journal of medical Internet research · 2015Review
- Challenges, alternatives, and paths to sustainability: better public health promotion using social networking pages as key tools.Journal of medical systems · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Internet has undergone rapid development, with significant impact on social life and on modes of communication. Modern management of type 1 diabetes requires that patients have access to continuous support and learning opportunities. Although Web 2.0 resources can provide this support, few pediatric clinics offer it as part of routine diabetes care.
objectiveWe aimed to explore patients' and parents' attitudes toward a local Web 2.0 portal tailored to young patients with type 1 diabetes and their parents, with social networking tools such as message boards and blogs, locally produced self-care and treatment information, and interactive pedagogic devices. Opportunities and obstacles to the implementation of Web 2.0 applications in clinical practice were sought.
methodsParticipants were 16 mothers, 3 fathers, and 5 young patients (ages 11-18 years; median 14 years) who each wrote an essay on their experience using the portal, irrespective of frequency and/or their success in using it. Two main guiding questions were asked. A qualitative content analysis was conducted of the essays as a whole.
resultsThree main categories of portal users' attitudes were found; we named them "the management tool," "the generator," and "the gatekeeper." One category was related to the management tool functionality of the portal, and a wide range of concrete examples was found regarding useful facts and updates. Being enabled to search when necessary and find reliable information provided by local clinicians was regarded as a great advantage, facilitating a feeling of security and being in control. Finding answers to difficult-to-ask questions, questions portal users did not know they had before, and questions focusing on sensitive areas such as anxiety and fear, was also an important feature. A second category was related to the generator function in that visiting the portal could generate more information than expected, which could lead to increased use. Active message boards and chat rooms were found to have great value for enhancing mediation of third party peer-to-peer information. A certain level of active users from peer families and visible signs of their activity were considered necessary to attract returning users. A third category was related to the gatekeeper function of the password requirement, which created various access problems. This and other unsuccessful experiences caused users to drop the portal. A largely open portal was suggested to enhance use by those associated with the child with diabetes, such as school personnel, relatives, friends and others, and also by young users somewhat unwilling to self-identify with the disease.
conclusionsWeb 2.0 services have great potential for supporting parents and patients with type 1 diabetes by enhancing their information retrieval and disease management. Well-developed services, such as this one, may generate continued use and should, therefore, be carefully maintained and updated by health care professionals who are alert and active on the site with new information and updates. Login procedures should be simple and minimized as much as possible. The education of clinical practitioners regarding the use of Web 2.0 resources needs more attention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.