Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20510539›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2011

Phase II evaluation of gefitinib in patients with newly diagnosed Grade 4 astrocytoma: Mayo/North Central Cancer Treatment Group Study N0074.

Joon H Uhm, Karla V Ballman, Wenting Wu, Caterina Giannini, J C Krauss, Jan C Buckner, C D James, Bernd W Scheithauer, Robert J Behrens, Patrick J Flynn and 3 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 104 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
104citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

104 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 184 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

44 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Joon H UhmDivision of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. uhm.joon@mayo.edu
Karla V Ballman
Wenting Wu
Caterina Giannini
J C Krauss
Jan C Buckner
C D James
Bernd W Scheithauer
Robert J Behrens
Patrick J Flynn
Paul L Schaefer
Shaker R Dakhill
Kurt A Jaeckle
WinnMed · USMayo Clinic · USCommunity Hospital · USIowa Oncology Research Association · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USMetro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium · USWichita Clinic · US

Funding

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHU10CA025224 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI BUCKNER, JAN C · 1985 to 2013
$85.0M
SUPPLEMENTU10CA037404 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI LOPRINZI, CHARLES L · 1985 to 2014
$34.8M
COMMUNITY CLINICAL ONCOLOGY PROGRAMU10CA035431 · NCI · VIA CHRISTI REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER · PI DAKHIL, SHAKER R · 1985 to 2014
$24.0M
W METRO-MINNEAPOLIS COMMUNITY CLINICAL ONCOLOGY PROGRAMU10CA035267 · NCI · PARK NICOLLET INSTITUTE · PI LEACH, JOSEPH · 1985 to 2014
$23.2M
MICHIGAN CANCER RESEARCH CONSORTIUM CCOPU10CA063848 · NCI · SAINT JOSEPH MERCY HEALTH SYSTEM · PI STELLA, PHILIP J · 1994 to 2014
$17.2M
SIOUX COMMUNITY CANCER CONSORTIUMU10CA035103 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA · PI MAZURCZAK, MIROSLAW · 1985 to 2014
$11.6M
MISSOURI VALLEY CANCER CONSORTIUM CCOPU10CA063849 · NCI · MISSOURI VALLEY CANCER CONSORTIUM, INC. · PI SOORI, GAMINI · 1994 to 2014
$11.3M
COMMUNITY CLINICAL ONCOLOGY PROGRAMU10CA035195 · NCI · CARLE FOUNDATION HOSPITAL (URBANA, IL) · PI ROWLAND, KENDRITH MARTIN · 1985 to 2014
$11.3M
Illinois Oncology Research Association Community Clinical Oncology ProgramU10CA035113 · NCI · ONCOLOGY-HEMATOLOGY ASSOC-CENTRAL ILL · PI LE-LINDQWISTER, NGUYET A. · 1985 to 2014
$10.8M
DULUTH COMMUNITY CLINICAL ONCOLOGY PROGRAMU10CA035269 · NCI · ESSENTIA INSTITUTE OF RURAL HEALTH · PI NIKCEVICH, DANIEL A · 1985 to 2014
$10.7M
IOWA ONCOLOGY RESEARCH ASSOCIATION CCOPU10CA035101 · NCI · IOWA ONCOLOGY RESEARCH ASSOCIATION · PI BEHRENS, ROBERT J. · 1985 to 2014
$10.1M
TOLEDO COMMUNITY CLINICAL ONCOLOGY PROGRAMU10CA035415 · NCI · TOLEDO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ONCOLOGY PROG · PI MOWAT, REX BRADLEY · 1985 to 2014
$9.9M
NCI NIH HHS CA-25224NCI NIH HHS CA-35101NCI NIH HHS CA-35103NCI NIH HHS CA-35113NCI NIH HHS CA-35195NCI NIH HHS CA-35267NCI NIH HHS CA-35269NCI NIH HHS CA-35415NCI NIH HHS CA-35431NCI NIH HHS CA-35448NCI NIH HHS CA-37404NCI NIH HHS CA-37417NCI NIH HHS CA-52352NCI NIH HHS CA-63848NCI NIH HHS CA-63849NCI NIH HHS N01 CA035431NCI NIH HHS U10 CA025224NCI NIH HHS U10 CA035101NCI NIH HHS U10 CA035103NCI NIH HHS U10 CA035113NCI NIH HHS U10 CA035195NCI NIH HHS U10 CA035267NCI NIH HHS U10 CA035269NCI NIH HHS U10 CA035415NCI NIH HHS U10 CA035431NCI NIH HHS U10 CA035448NCI NIH HHS U10 CA037404NCI NIH HHS U10 CA037417NCI NIH HHS U10 CA052352NCI NIH HHS U10 CA063848NCI NIH HHS U10 CA063849
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAmplification of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene represents one of the most frequent gene alterations in glioblastoma (GBM). In the current study, we evaluated gefitinib, a potent EGFR inhibitor, in the treatment of adults with newly diagnosed GBM. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Ninety-eight patients (96 evaluable) were accrued between May 18, 2001, and August 2, 2002. All were newly diagnosed GBM patients who were clinically and radiographically stable/improved after radiation treatment (enrollment within 5 weeks of radiation completion). No prior chemotherapy was permitted. EGFR amplification/mutation, as assessed by fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry, was not required for treatment with gefitinib but was studied when tissues were available. Gefitinib was administered at 500 mg each day; for patients receiving dexamethasone or enzyme-inducing (CYP3A4) agents, dose was escalated to a maximum of 1,000 mg QD. Treatment cycles were repeated at 4-week intervals with brain magnetic resonance imaging at 8-week intervals.

resultsOverall survival (OS; calculated from time of initial surgery) at 1 year (primary end point) with gefitinib was 54.2%, which was not statistically different compared with that of historical control population (48.9%, data from three previous Phase III North Central Cancer Treatment Group studies of newly diagnosed GBM patients). Progression-free survival (PFS) at 1 year post-RT (16.7%) was also not significantly different to that of historical controls (30.3%). Clinical outcome was not affected by EGFR status (amplification or vIII mutation). Fatigue (41%), rash (62%), and loose stools (58%) constituted the most frequent adverse events, the majority of these being limited to Grade 1/2. Of note, the occurrence of drug-related adverse effects, such as loose stools was associated with improved OS.

conclusionsIn our evaluation of nearly 100 patients with newly diagnosed GBM, treatment with adjuvant gefitinib post-radiation was not associated with significant improvement in OS or PFS. However, patients who experienced gefitinib-associated adverse effects (rash/diarrhea) did demonstrate improved OS.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsBrain NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantDexamethasoneDiarrheaDisease-Free SurvivalDrug Administration ScheduleEnzyme ActivatorsErbB ReceptorsFemaleGefitinibGene AmplificationGenes, erbB-1GlioblastomaAntineoplastic AgentsDexamethasoneEnzyme ActivatorsErbB ReceptorsGefitinibQuinazolines

Identifiers

PMID20510539
PMCPMC5753591
OpenAlexW2077524564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.