ReviewBiochemical pharmacology2010
Fine tuning chemotherapy to match BRCA1 status.
Review in Biochemical pharmacology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preclinical evaluation of radiation therapy ofInternational journal of biological sciences · 2021Article
- Small-Molecule Inhibitors Targeting DNA Repair and DNA Repair Deficiency in Research and Cancer Therapy.Cell chemical biology · 2017Review
- BRCA1-directed, enhanced and aberrant homologous recombination: mechanism and potential treatment strategies.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2012Review
- Article
- In Vitro Enhanced Sensitivity to Cisplatin in D67Y BRCA1 RING Domain Protein.Breast cancer : basic and clinical research · 2011Article
- BRCA mutations in the management of breast cancer: the state of the art.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Targeted cancer therapies have been primarily directed at inhibiting oncogenes that are overexpressed or constitutively active in tumors. It is thought that as the cell's circuitry gets re-wired by the constitutive activation of some pathways it becomes exquisitely dependent on this activity. Tumor cell death normally results from inhibiting constitutively active pathways. The dependence of tumor cells on the activity of these pathways has been called oncogene addiction. Approaches that aim to exploit loss of function, rather than gain of function changes have also become a powerful addition to our arsenal of cancer therapies. In particular, when tumors acquire mutations that disrupt pathways in the DNA damage response they rely on alternative pathways that can be targeted pharmacologically. Here we review the use of BRCA1 as a marker of response to therapy with a particular focus on the use of Cisplatin and PARP inhibitors. We also explore the use of BRCA1 as a marker of response to microtubule inhibitors and how all these approaches will bring us closer to the goal of personalized medicine in cancer treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.