ArticleCurrent cardiovascular imaging reports2009
Non-invasive Monitoring of Angiogenesis in Cardiology.
Article in Current cardiovascular imaging reports, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beyond perfusion: a review of peptide radiopharmaceuticals for cardiovascular imaging.Npj imaging · 2025Review
- Engineered circulatory scaffolds for building cardiac tissue.Journal of thoracic disease · 2018Review
- Molecular imaging to identify the vulnerable plaque--from basic research to clinical practice.Molecular imaging and biology · 2012Review
- Emerging roles for integrated imaging modalities in cardiovascular cell-based therapeutics: a clinical perspective.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Angiogenesis plays an important role in the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis and after myocardial infarction. Furthermore, angiogenesis has been the focus of many therapeutic strategies. In view of that, a direct and clear understanding of the role of these pathways in the living subject is needed. Molecular Imaging has emerged as a powerful tool to study biological processes non-invasively. In this review, evidence will be presented and discussed on the feasibility of different molecular imaging strategies to study the involvement of angiogenic pathways in the assessment of the atherosclerotic disease and as a tool to assess angiogenic therapy. Focus will be placed on those imaging modalities with the potential to be translated to clinical use.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.