Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20508531›Full record

ArticleMedical care2010

Partnership research: a practical trial design for evaluation of a natural experiment to improve depression care.

Leif I Solberg, Russell E Glasgow, Jürgen Unützer, Nancy Jaeckels, Gary Oftedahl, Arne Beck, Michael V Maciosek, A Lauren Crain

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical care, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03000751 (CT Dose Optimization and Standardization Endeavor), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03000751 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

CT Dose Optimization and Standardization Endeavor (DOSE) Collaboratory

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2016 to 2020Enrolled864,080ConditionsIonizing Radiation Exposure, Quality ImprovementArmsSimple Audit Report, Multi-Component Intervention, In-Person Meeting
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Predictors of Poor Response to Depression Treatment in Primary Care.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2016
    Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. National pathways for suicide prevention and health services research.American journal of preventive medicine · 2014
    Review
  19. The effect of depression treatment on work productivity.The American journal of managed care · 2014
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Leif I SolbergHealthPartners Research Foundation, Minneapolis, MN 55440-1524, USA. leif.i.solberg@healthpartners.com
Russell E Glasgow
Jürgen Unützer
Nancy Jaeckels
Gary Oftedahl
Arne Beck
Michael V Maciosek
A Lauren Crain

Funding

Evaluation of a Natural Experiment to Improve Statewide Depression Care in MNR01MH080692 · NIMH · HEALTHPARTNERS INSTITUTE · PI SOLBERG, LEIF I · 2007 to 2011
$3.2M
NIMH NIH HHS 5R01MH080692NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH080692
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTranslational research is increasingly important as academic health centers transform themselves to meet new requirements of National Institutes of Health funding. Most attention has focused on T1 translation studies (bench to bedside) with considerable uncertainty about how to enhance T2 (effectiveness trials) and especially T3 (implementation studies).

objectiveTo describe an innovative example of a T3 study, conducted as partnership research with the leaders of a major natural experiment in Minnesota to improve the primary care of depression.

methodsAll health plans in the state have agreed on a new payment model to support clinics that implement the well-evidenced collaborative care model for depression in the Depression Improvement Across Minnesota: Offering a New Direction initiative. The Depression Improvement Across Minnesota: Offering a New Direction study was developed in an ongoing partnership with the Initiative leaders from 7 health plans, 85 clinics, and a regional quality improvement collaborative to evaluate the implementation and its impacts on patients and other stakeholders. We agreed on a staggered implementation, multiple baseline research design, using the concepts of practical clinical trials and engaged scholarship and have collaborated on all aspects of conducting the study, including joint identification of patient and clinic survey recipients.

resultsComplex study methods have worked well through 20 months because of the commitment of all stakeholders to both the Initiative and the Study. Over 1500 subjects have been recruited from health plan information delivered weekly, and 99.7% of 316 physicians and administrators from all participating clinical organizations have completed the Study surveys.

conclusionsPartnership research can greatly facilitate translational research studies.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicCooperative BehaviorDelivery of Health CareDepressive DisorderHumansInterinstitutional RelationsMinnesotaReimbursement Mechanisms

Identifiers

PMID20508531
PMCPMC4270473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.