Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20508248›Full record

ReviewMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR2010

Gliding motility revisited: how do the myxobacteria move without flagella?

Emilia M F Mauriello, Tâm Mignot, Zhaomin Yang, David R Zusman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Chiral gliding: Right-handed navigation of filamentous cyanobacteria.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Bacterial Motility and Its Role in Skin and Wound Infections.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Analysis ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Frontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emilia M F MaurielloDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, 16 Barker Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-3204, USA.
Tâm Mignot
Zhaomin Yang
David R Zusman

Funding

SENSORY TRANSDUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT IN A BACTERIUMR01GM020509 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI ZUSMAN, DAVID ROBERT · 1985 to 2014
$5.9M
Regulation and Mechanism of M. xanthus Social GlidingR01GM071601 · NIGMS · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI YANG, ZHAOMIN · 2004 to 2009
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM020509NIGMS NIH HHS GM071601NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM020509NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM071601
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In bacteria, motility is important for a wide variety of biological functions such as virulence, fruiting body formation, and biofilm formation. While most bacteria move by using specialized appendages, usually external or periplasmic flagella, some bacteria use other mechanisms for their movements that are less well characterized. These mechanisms do not always exhibit obvious motility structures. Myxococcus xanthus is a motile bacterium that does not produce flagella but glides slowly over solid surfaces. How M. xanthus moves has remained a puzzle that has challenged microbiologists for over 50 years. Fortunately, recent advances in the analysis of motility mutants, bioinformatics, and protein localization have revealed likely mechanisms for the two M. xanthus motility systems. These results are summarized in this review.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsFlagellaModels, BiologicalMyxococcus xanthusBacterial Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20508248
PMCPMC2884410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.