Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20507612›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2010

A framework for developing an evidence-based, comprehensive tobacco control program.

Laura Rosen, Elliot Rosenberg, Martin McKee, Shosh Gan-Noy, Diane Levin, Elana Mayshar, Galia Shacham, John Borowski, Gabi Bin Nun, Boaz Lev and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Historic tobacco legislation in Israel: a moment to celebrate.Israel journal of health policy research · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Feasibility of Measuring Tobacco Smoke Air Pollution in Homes: Report from a Pilot Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2015
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Tobacco policy in Israel: 1948-2014 and beyond.Israel journal of health policy research · 2015
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Laura RosenDept, of Health Promotion, School of Public Health, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University and Chair, Tobacco Control Subcommittee, Healthy Israel 2020, Israel. rosenl@post.tau.ac.il.
Elliot Rosenberg
Martin McKee
Shosh Gan-Noy
Diane Levin
Elana Mayshar
Galia Shacham
John Borowski
Gabi Bin Nun
Boaz Lev
Healthy Israel 2020 Tobacco Control Subcommittee

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTobacco control is an area where the translation of evidence into policy would seem to be straightforward, given the wealth of epidemiological, behavioural and other types of research available. Yet, even here challenges exist. These include information overload, concealment of key (industry-funded) evidence, contextualization, assessment of population impact, and the changing nature of the threat.

methodsIn the context of Israel's health targeting initiative, Healthy Israel 2020, we describe the steps taken to develop a comprehensive tobacco control strategy. We elaborate on the following: a) scientific issues influencing the choice of tobacco control strategies; b) organization of existing evidence of effectiveness of interventions into a manageable form, and c) consideration of relevant philosophical and political issues. We propose a framework for developing a plan and illustrate this process with a case study in Israel.

resultsBroad consensus exists regarding the effectiveness of most interventions, but current recommendations differ in the emphasis they place on different strategies. Scientific challenges include integration of complex and sometimes conflicting information from authoritative sources, and lack of estimates of population impact of interventions. Philosophical and political challenges include the use of evidence-based versus innovative policymaking, the importance of individual versus governmental responsibility, and whether and how interventions should be prioritized.The proposed framework includes: 1) compilation of a list of potential interventions 2) modification of that list based on local needs and political constraints; 3) streamlining the list by categorizing interventions into broad groupings of related interventions; together these groupings form the basis of a comprehensive plan; and 4) refinement of the plan by comparing it to existing comprehensive plans.

conclusionsDevelopment of a comprehensive tobacco control plan is a complex endeavour, involving crucial decisions regarding intervention components. "Off the shelf" plans, which need to be adapted to local settings, are available from a variety of sources, and a multitude of individual recommendations are available. The proposed framework for adapting existing approaches to the local social and political climate may assist others planning for smoke-free societies. Additionally, this experience has implications for development of evidence-based health plans addressing other risk factors.

Identifiers

PMID20507612
PMCPMC2894826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.