ArticleHealth research policy and systems2010
A framework for developing an evidence-based, comprehensive tobacco control program.
Article in Health research policy and systems, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Social factors, health policy, and environment: implications for cardiovascular disease across the globe.European heart journal · 2025Review
- Tobacco use trends among youth in Saudi Arabia: 2007-2022.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Historic tobacco legislation in Israel: a moment to celebrate.Israel journal of health policy research · 2020Article
- The many meanings of evidence: a comparative analysis of the forms and roles of evidence within three health policy processes in Cambodia.Health research policy and systems · 2017Article
- Article
- Complying with the framework convention for tobacco control: an application of the Abridged SimSmoke model to Israel.Israel journal of health policy research · 2016Article
- Feasibility of Measuring Tobacco Smoke Air Pollution in Homes: Report from a Pilot Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2015Article
- Global prevention and control of NCDs: Limitations of the standard approach.Journal of public health policy · 2015Article
- Tobacco policy in Israel: 1948-2014 and beyond.Israel journal of health policy research · 2015Article
- Towards a comprehensive global approach to prevention and control of NCDs.Globalization and health · 2014Article
- Do health policy advisors know what the public wants? An empirical comparison of how health policy advisors assess public preferences regarding smoke-free air, and what the public actually prefers.Israel journal of health policy research · 2013Article
- Yes, research can inform health policy; but can we bridge the 'Do-Knowing It's Been Done' gap?Health research policy and systems · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTobacco control is an area where the translation of evidence into policy would seem to be straightforward, given the wealth of epidemiological, behavioural and other types of research available. Yet, even here challenges exist. These include information overload, concealment of key (industry-funded) evidence, contextualization, assessment of population impact, and the changing nature of the threat.
methodsIn the context of Israel's health targeting initiative, Healthy Israel 2020, we describe the steps taken to develop a comprehensive tobacco control strategy. We elaborate on the following: a) scientific issues influencing the choice of tobacco control strategies; b) organization of existing evidence of effectiveness of interventions into a manageable form, and c) consideration of relevant philosophical and political issues. We propose a framework for developing a plan and illustrate this process with a case study in Israel.
resultsBroad consensus exists regarding the effectiveness of most interventions, but current recommendations differ in the emphasis they place on different strategies. Scientific challenges include integration of complex and sometimes conflicting information from authoritative sources, and lack of estimates of population impact of interventions. Philosophical and political challenges include the use of evidence-based versus innovative policymaking, the importance of individual versus governmental responsibility, and whether and how interventions should be prioritized.The proposed framework includes: 1) compilation of a list of potential interventions 2) modification of that list based on local needs and political constraints; 3) streamlining the list by categorizing interventions into broad groupings of related interventions; together these groupings form the basis of a comprehensive plan; and 4) refinement of the plan by comparing it to existing comprehensive plans.
conclusionsDevelopment of a comprehensive tobacco control plan is a complex endeavour, involving crucial decisions regarding intervention components. "Off the shelf" plans, which need to be adapted to local settings, are available from a variety of sources, and a multitude of individual recommendations are available. The proposed framework for adapting existing approaches to the local social and political climate may assist others planning for smoke-free societies. Additionally, this experience has implications for development of evidence-based health plans addressing other risk factors.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.