Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20507583›Full record

ArticleBMC systems biology2010

Co-expression module analysis reveals biological processes, genomic gain, and regulatory mechanisms associated with breast cancer progression.

Zhiao Shi, Catherine K Derow, Bing Zhang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC systems biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 130 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. iBBiG: iterative binary bi-clustering of gene sets.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2012
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Multi-omics peripheral and core regions of cancer.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Modularity in Biological Networks.Frontiers in genetics · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhiao ShiAdvanced Computing Center for Research & Education, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA.
Catherine K Derow
Bing Zhang
Vanderbilt University · US

Funding

Project 6 Interactions of Serotonin and Circadian Signaling NetworksP50MH078028 · NIMH · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI SNODDY, JAY R · 2007 to 2011
$9.8M
Systems Approach to the Biological Basis of Colon Cancer MetastasesR01GM088822 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BEAUCHAMP, ROBERT DANIEL, ZHANG, BING · 2009 to 2012
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM088822NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM088822NIMH NIH HHS P50MH078028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGene expression signatures are typically identified by correlating gene expression patterns to a disease phenotype of interest. However, individual gene-based signatures usually suffer from low reproducibility and interpretability.

resultsWe have developed a novel algorithm Iterative Clique Enumeration (ICE) for identifying relatively independent maximal cliques as co-expression modules and a module-based approach to the analysis of gene expression data. Applying this approach on a public breast cancer dataset identified 19 modules whose expression levels were significantly correlated with tumor grade. The correlations were reproducible for 17 modules in an independent breast cancer dataset, and the reproducibility was considerably higher than that based on individual genes or modules identified by other algorithms. Sixteen out of the 17 modules showed significant enrichment in certain Gene Ontology (GO) categories. Specifically, modules related to cell proliferation and immune response were up-regulated in high-grade tumors while those related to cell adhesion was down-regulated. Further analyses showed that transcription factors NYFB, E2F1/E2F3, NRF1, and ELK1 were responsible for the up-regulation of the cell proliferation modules. IRF family and ETS family proteins were responsible for the up-regulation of the immune response modules. Moreover, inhibition of the PPARA signaling pathway may also play an important role in tumor progression. The module without GO enrichment was found to be associated with a potential genomic gain in 8q21-23 in high-grade tumors. The 17-module signature of breast tumor progression clustered patients into subgroups with significantly different relapse-free survival times. Namely, patients with lower cell proliferation and higher cell adhesion levels had significantly lower risk of recurrence, both for all patients (p = 0.004) and for those with grade 2 tumors (p = 0.017).

conclusionsThe ICE algorithm is effective in identifying relatively independent co-expression modules from gene co-expression networks and the module-based approach illustrated in this study provides a robust, interpretable, and mechanistic characterization of transcriptional changes.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsModels, BiologicalBreast NeoplasmsCell AdhesionCluster AnalysisDisease ProgressionFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene Regulatory NetworksHumansOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPPAR alphaRisk FactorsSignal TransductionTranscription FactorsPPAR alphaTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID20507583
PMCPMC2902438
OpenAlexW2146060062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.