Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20507582›Full record

Trial reportTrials2010

The Viborg Vascular (VIVA) screening trial of 65-74 year old men in the central region of Denmark: study protocol.

Nikolaj Grøndal, Rikke Søgaard, Eskild W Henneberg, Jes S Lindholt

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00662480 (Randomized Preventive Vascular Screening Trial of 65-74 Year Old Men in the Central Region of Denmark), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00662480 phase4unknown statusnot on this map

Randomized Preventive Vascular Screening Trial of 65-74 Year Old Men in the Central Region of Denmark

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentral Jutland Regional HospitalRan2008 to 2023Enrolled40,000ConditionsAbdominal Aortic Aneurysms, Peripheral Arterial Disease, HypertensionArmsScreening for hypertension, lower limb atherosclerosis and abdominal aortic aneurysm
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Screening for peripheral arterial disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  5. Asthma Associates With Human Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm and Rupture.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2016
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Plasma Cystatin B Association With Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms and Need for Later Surgical Repair: A Sub-study of the VIVA Trial.European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery · 2018
    Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nikolaj GrøndalDepartment of vascular surgery, Viborg Hospital, Denmark. nikolaj.groendal@viborg.rm.dk
Rikke Søgaard
Eskild W Henneberg
Jes S Lindholt

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundScreening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) of men aged 65-74 years reduces the AAA-related mortality and is generally considered cost effective. Despite of this only a few national health care services have implemented permanent programs. Around 10% of men in this group have peripheral arterial disease (PAD) defined by an ankle brachial systolic blood pressure index (ABI) below 0.9 resulting in an increased mortality-rate of 25-30%. In addition well-documented health benefits may be achieved through primary prophylaxis by initiating systematic cholesterol-lowering, smoking cessation, low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (aspirins), exercise, a healthy diet and blood-pressure control altogether reducing the increased risks for cardiovascular disease by at least 20-25%. The benefits of combining screening for AAA and PAD seem evident; yet they remain to be established. The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and the cost-effectiveness of a combined screening program for AAA, PAD and hypertension.

methodsThe Viborg Vascular (VIVA) screening trial is a randomized, clinically controlled study designed to evaluate the benefits of vascular screening and modern vascular prophylaxis in a population of 50,000 men aged 65-74 years. Enrolment started October 2008 and is expected to stop in October 2010. The primary outcome is all-cause mortality. The secondary outcomes are cardiovascular mortality, AAA-related mortality, hospital services related to cardiovascular conditions, prevalence of AAA, PAD and potentially undiagnosed hypertension, health-related quality of life and cost effectiveness. Data analysis by intention to treat.

resultsMajor follow-up will be performed at 3, 5 and 10 years and final study result after 15 years.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00662480.

Indexed as

AgedAortic Aneurysm, AbdominalCost-Benefit AnalysisDenmarkFollow-Up StudiesHumansHypertensionMaleMass ScreeningNational Health ProgramsPeripheral Vascular DiseasesPrevalenceSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID20507582
PMCPMC2891736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.