Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20507169›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2010

Direct DNA methylation profiling using methyl binding domain proteins.

Yinni Yu, Steve Blair, David Gillespie, Randy Jensen, David Myszka, Ahmed H Badran, Indraneel Ghosh, Alexander Chagovetz

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yinni YuDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Utah, 72 South Central Campus Drive, Room 2750, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA.
Steve Blair
David Gillespie
Randy Jensen
David Myszka
Ahmed H Badran
Indraneel Ghosh
Alexander Chagovetz
University of Utah · US

Funding

Real-Time Heteroplasmy Analysis on MicroarraysR44GM084603 · NIGMS · SALT LAKE CITY BIOSCIENCE, INC. · PI CHAGOVETZ, ALEXANDER MICHAEL · 2008 to 2010
$1.7M
Promoter Specific Hypermethylation Sensors for Early Cancer DetectionR21CA143661 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI GHOSH, INDRANEEL · 2010 to 2011
$349k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA143661NCI NIH HHS R21CA143661NIGMS NIH HHS 4R44GM084603-02NIGMS NIH HHS R44 GM084603
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methylation of DNA is responsible for gene silencing by establishing heterochromatin structure that represses transcription, and studies have shown that cytosine methylation of CpG islands in promoter regions acts as a precursor to early cancer development. The naturally occurring methyl binding domain (MBD) proteins from mammals are known to bind to the methylated CpG dinucleotide (mCpG) and subsequently recruit other chromatin-modifying proteins to suppress transcription. Conventional methods of detection for methylated DNA involve bisulfite treatment or immunoprecipitation prior to performing an assay. We focus on proof-of-concept studies for a direct microarray-based assay using surface-bound methylated probes. The recombinant protein 1xMBD-GFP recognizes hemimethylation and symmetric methylation of the CpG sequence of hybridized dsDNA, while displaying greater affinity for the symmetric methylation motif, as evaluated by SPR. From these studies, for symmetric mCpG, the K(D) for 1xMBD-GFP ranged from 106 to 870 nM, depending upon the proximity of the methylation site to the sensor surface. The K(D) values for nonsymmetrical methylation motifs were consistently greater (>2 muM), but the binding selectivity between symmetric and hemimethylation motifs ranged from 4 to 30, with reduced selectivity for sites close to the surface or multiple sites in proximity, which we attribute to steric effects. Fitting skew normal probability density functions to our data, we estimate an accuracy of 97.5% for our method in identifying methylated CpG loci, which can be improved through optimization of probe design and surface density.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationBase SequenceCpG IslandsDNADNA-Binding ProteinsGreen Fluorescent ProteinsOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisProtein BindingProtein Structure, TertiaryRecombinant ProteinsSensitivity and SpecificitySurface Plasmon ResonanceDNADNA-Binding ProteinsGreen Fluorescent ProteinsRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20507169
PMCPMC2946844
OpenAlexW2088844281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.