ArticleAnalytical chemistry2010
Direct DNA methylation profiling using methyl binding domain proteins.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanistic model for epigenetic maintenance by methyl-CpG-binding domain proteins.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Hybridization-based CpG methylation level detection using methyl-CpG-binding domain-fused luciferase.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2023Article
- Density Control over MBD2 Receptor-Coated Surfaces Provides Superselective Binding of Hypermethylated DNA.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2022Article
- Sensitive detection of methylated DNA and methyltransferase activity based on the lighting up of FAM-labeled DNA quenched fluorescence by gold nanoparticles.RSC advances · 2019Article
- An examination of critical parameters in hybridization-based epigenotyping using magnetic microparticles.Biotechnology progress · 2018Article
- Fast and precise detection of DNA methylation with tetramethylammonium-filled nanopore.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Engineering affinity agents for the detection of hemi-methylated CpG sites in DNA.Molecular systems design & engineering · 2016Article
- DNA Methyltransferase Activity Assays: Advances and Challenges.Theranostics · 2016Review
- Characterization and directed evolution of a methyl-binding domain protein for high-sensitivity DNA methylation analysis.Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS · 2015Article
- Evaluating the sensitivity of hybridization-based epigenotyping using a methyl binding domain protein.The Analyst · 2014Article
- Detection and quantification of methylation in DNA using solid-state nanopores.Scientific reports · 2013Article
- Epigenome-Wide Association Studies (EWAS) in Cancer.Current genomics · 2012Article
- Methyl-binding domain protein-based DNA isolation from human blood serum combines DNA analyses and serum-autoantibody testing.BMC clinical pathology · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Methylation of DNA is responsible for gene silencing by establishing heterochromatin structure that represses transcription, and studies have shown that cytosine methylation of CpG islands in promoter regions acts as a precursor to early cancer development. The naturally occurring methyl binding domain (MBD) proteins from mammals are known to bind to the methylated CpG dinucleotide (mCpG) and subsequently recruit other chromatin-modifying proteins to suppress transcription. Conventional methods of detection for methylated DNA involve bisulfite treatment or immunoprecipitation prior to performing an assay. We focus on proof-of-concept studies for a direct microarray-based assay using surface-bound methylated probes. The recombinant protein 1xMBD-GFP recognizes hemimethylation and symmetric methylation of the CpG sequence of hybridized dsDNA, while displaying greater affinity for the symmetric methylation motif, as evaluated by SPR. From these studies, for symmetric mCpG, the K(D) for 1xMBD-GFP ranged from 106 to 870 nM, depending upon the proximity of the methylation site to the sensor surface. The K(D) values for nonsymmetrical methylation motifs were consistently greater (>2 muM), but the binding selectivity between symmetric and hemimethylation motifs ranged from 4 to 30, with reduced selectivity for sites close to the surface or multiple sites in proximity, which we attribute to steric effects. Fitting skew normal probability density functions to our data, we estimate an accuracy of 97.5% for our method in identifying methylated CpG loci, which can be improved through optimization of probe design and surface density.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.