Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20505065›Full record

ArticleRadiology2010

Automated retrieval of CT images of liver lesions on the basis of image similarity: method and preliminary results.

Sandy A Napel, Christopher F Beaulieu, Cesar Rodriguez, Jingyu Cui, Jiajing Xu, Ankit Gupta, Daniel Korenblum, Hayit Greenspan, Yongjun Ma, Daniel L Rubin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Clinical evaluation of semi-automatic landmark-based lesion tracking software for CT-scans.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2014
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Sandy A NapelDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, James H. Clark Center S323, Stanford, CA 94305-5450, USA. snapel@stanford.edu
Christopher F Beaulieu
Cesar Rodriguez
Jingyu Cui
Jiajing Xu
Ankit Gupta
Daniel Korenblum
Hayit Greenspan
Yongjun Ma
Daniel L Rubin
Stanford University · USClark University · USTel Aviv University · ILTianjin University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

THREE-DIMENSIONAL CT COLONOGRAPHYR01CA072023 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BEAULIEU, CHRISTOPHER F · 1996 to 2007
$4.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA072023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop a system to facilitate the retrieval of radiologic images that contain similar-appearing lesions and to perform a preliminary evaluation of this system with a database of computed tomographic (CT) images of the liver and an external standard of image similarity. MATERIALS AND

methodsInstitutional review board approval was obtained for retrospective analysis of deidentified patient images. Thereafter, 30 portal venous phase CT images of the liver exhibiting one of three types of liver lesions (13 cysts, seven hemangiomas, 10 metastases) were selected. A radiologist used a controlled lexicon and a tool developed for complete and standardized description of lesions to identify and annotate each lesion with semantic features. In addition, this software automatically computed image features on the basis of image texture and boundary sharpness. Semantic and computer-generated features were weighted and combined into a feature vector representing each image. An independent reference standard was created for pairwise image similarity. This was used in a leave-one-out cross-validation to train weights that optimized the rankings of images in the database in terms of similarity to query images. Performance was evaluated by using precision-recall curves and normalized discounted cumulative gain (NDCG), a common measure for the usefulness of information retrieval.

resultsWhen used individually, groups of semantic, texture, and boundary features resulted in various levels of performance in retrieving relevant lesions. However, combining all features produced the best overall results. Mean precision was greater than 90% at all values of recall, and mean, best, and worst case retrieval accuracy was greater than 95%, 100%, and greater than 78%, respectively, with NDCG.

conclusionPreliminary assessment of this approach shows excellent retrieval results for three types of liver lesions visible on portal venous CT images, warranting continued development and validation in a larger and more comprehensive database.

Indexed as

Tomography, X-Ray ComputedAutomationCystsHemangiomaHumansLiver DiseasesLiver NeoplasmsPortal VeinRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedReference StandardsRetrospective StudiesSoftwareTerminology as Topic

Identifiers

PMID20505065
PMCPMC2897688
OpenAlexW2120877847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.