Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20505002›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2010

Threshold Average Precision (TAP-k): a measure of retrieval designed for bioinformatics.

Hyrum D Carroll, Maricel G Kann, Sergey L Sheetlin, John L Spouge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Building a PubMed knowledge graph.Scientific data · 2020
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Biocuration with insufficient resources and fixed timelines.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2015
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. GeneTUKit: a software for document-level gene normalization.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2011
    Article
  14. Improving Retrieval Efficacy of Homology Searches Using the False Discovery Rate.IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hyrum D CarrollNational Center for Biotechnology Information, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA.
Maricel G Kann
Sergey L Sheetlin
John L Spouge

Funding

Protein domains as molecular units to unravel functional pathways of cancer genesK22CA143148 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY · PI KANN, MARICEL G. · 2009 to 2011
$490k
The Statistical Evaluation Of Retrieval Efficiency From A Database.ZIALM000094 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI SPOUGE, JOHN · 2010 to 2014
$161k
Intramural NIH HHSNCI NIH HHS 1K22CA143148NCI NIH HHS K22 CA143148
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationSince database retrieval is a fundamental operation, the measurement of retrieval efficacy is critical to progress in bioinformatics. This article points out some issues with current methods of measuring retrieval efficacy and suggests some improvements. In particular, many studies have used the pooled receiver operating characteristic for n irrelevant records (ROC(n)) score, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of a 'pooled' ROC curve, truncated at n irrelevant records. Unfortunately, the pooled ROC(n) score does not faithfully reflect actual usage of retrieval algorithms. Additionally, a pooled ROC(n) score can be very sensitive to retrieval results from as little as a single query.

methodsTo replace the pooled ROC(n) score, we propose the Threshold Average Precision (TAP-k), a measure closely related to the well-known average precision in information retrieval, but reflecting the usage of E-values in bioinformatics. Furthermore, in addition to conditions previously given in the literature, we introduce three new criteria that an ideal measure of retrieval efficacy should satisfy.

resultsPSI-BLAST, GLOBAL, HMMER and RPS-BLAST provided examples of using the TAP-k and pooled ROC(n) scores to evaluate sequence retrieval algorithms. In particular, compelling examples using real data highlight the drawbacks of the pooled ROC(n) score, showing that it can produce evaluations skewing far from intuitive expectations. In contrast, the TAP-k satisfies most of the criteria desired in an ideal measure of retrieval efficacy. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The TAP-k web server and downloadable Perl script are freely available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/CBBresearch/Spouge/html.ncbi/tap/

Indexed as

SoftwareComputational BiologyDatabases, FactualInformation Storage and RetrievalInternetROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID20505002
PMCPMC2894514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.