ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2010
Threshold Average Precision (TAP-k): a measure of retrieval designed for bioinformatics.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Building a PubMed knowledge graph.Scientific data · 2020Article
- Article
- MultiDomainBenchmark: a multi-domain query and subject database suite.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Biocuration with insufficient resources and fixed timelines.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2015Article
- Ranking relations between diseases, drugs and genes for a curation task.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2012Article
- Article
- Soft tagging of overlapping high confidence gene mention variants for cross-species full-text gene normalization.BMC bioinformatics · 2011Article
- The gene normalization task in BioCreative III.BMC bioinformatics · 2011Article
- Overview of the BioCreative III Workshop.BMC bioinformatics · 2011Article
- Multi-stage gene normalization for full-text articles with context-based species filtering for dynamic dictionary entry selection.BMC bioinformatics · 2011Article
- Cross-species gene normalization by species inference.BMC bioinformatics · 2011Article
- The GNAT library for local and remote gene mention normalization.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2011Article
- GeneTUKit: a software for document-level gene normalization.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2011Article
- Improving Retrieval Efficacy of Homology Searches Using the False Discovery Rate.IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformaticsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationSince database retrieval is a fundamental operation, the measurement of retrieval efficacy is critical to progress in bioinformatics. This article points out some issues with current methods of measuring retrieval efficacy and suggests some improvements. In particular, many studies have used the pooled receiver operating characteristic for n irrelevant records (ROC(n)) score, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of a 'pooled' ROC curve, truncated at n irrelevant records. Unfortunately, the pooled ROC(n) score does not faithfully reflect actual usage of retrieval algorithms. Additionally, a pooled ROC(n) score can be very sensitive to retrieval results from as little as a single query.
methodsTo replace the pooled ROC(n) score, we propose the Threshold Average Precision (TAP-k), a measure closely related to the well-known average precision in information retrieval, but reflecting the usage of E-values in bioinformatics. Furthermore, in addition to conditions previously given in the literature, we introduce three new criteria that an ideal measure of retrieval efficacy should satisfy.
resultsPSI-BLAST, GLOBAL, HMMER and RPS-BLAST provided examples of using the TAP-k and pooled ROC(n) scores to evaluate sequence retrieval algorithms. In particular, compelling examples using real data highlight the drawbacks of the pooled ROC(n) score, showing that it can produce evaluations skewing far from intuitive expectations. In contrast, the TAP-k satisfies most of the criteria desired in an ideal measure of retrieval efficacy. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The TAP-k web server and downloadable Perl script are freely available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/CBBresearch/Spouge/html.ncbi/tap/
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.