Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20504926›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2010

Induction of neutralizing antibody responses to anthrax protective antigen by using influenza virus vectors: implications for disparate immune system priming pathways.

William A Langley, Konrad C Bradley, Zhu-Nan Li, Mary Ellen Smith, Matthias J Schnell, David A Steinhauer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Human anthrax vaccines: Current status and future prospects.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Peptide-Based Vaccines for Tuberculosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2022
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

William A LangleyDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, 1510 Clifton Road, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA.
Konrad C Bradley
Zhu-Nan Li
Mary Ellen Smith
Matthias J Schnell
David A Steinhauer
Emory University · USThomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

Virology and Molecular Biomarkers CoreP30AI050409 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Carlos del Rio · 2002 to 2026
$74.0M
A novel rhabdovirus-based anthrax vaccineR41AI063822 · NIAID · MOLECULAR TARGETING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. · PI SCHNELL, MATTHIAS JOHANNES · 2006 to 2007
$1.1M
Novel Vaccines for Anthrax PreventionR21AI053359 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI STEINHAUER, DAVID ALLEN · 2003 to 2004
$608k
NIAID NIH HHS AI/EB53359NIAID NIH HHS HHSN266200700006CNIAID NIH HHS P30 AI050409NIAID NIH HHS P30AI050409NIAID NIH HHS R41 AI063822NIAID NIH HHS R41AI063822
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Viral vectors based on influenza virus, rabies virus (RV), and vaccinia virus (VV) were used to express large polypeptide segments derived from the Bacillus anthracis protective antigen (PA). For the infectious influenza virus vector and recombinant VV constructs, the receptor binding domain (RBD or domain 4) or the lethal and edema factor binding domain (LEF or domain 1') were engineered into functional chimeric hemagglutinin (HA) glycoproteins. In the case of the RV vector, the viral glycoprotein (G) was used as a carrier for RBD in an inactivated form of the vector. These constructs were examined by using multiple homologous and heterologous prime/boost immunization regimens in order to optimize the induction of alpha-PA antibody responses. Several immunization combinations were shown to induce high titers of antibody recognizing the anthrax RBD and LEF domains, as well as the full-length PA protein in mice. The heterologous prime/boost immunization regimens that involved an initial intranasal administration of a live influenza virus vector, followed by an intramuscular boost with either the killed RV vector or the VV vector, were particularly effective, inducing antigen-specific antibodies at levels severalfold higher than homologous or alternative heterologous protocols. Furthermore, sera from several groups of the immunized mice demonstrated neutralization activity in an in vitro anthrax toxin neutralization assay. In some cases, such toxin-neutralizing activity was notably high, indicating that the mechanisms by which immunity is primed by live influenza virus vectors may have beneficial properties.

Indexed as

Genetic VectorsAnimalsAnthrax VaccinesAntibodies, BacterialAntibodies, NeutralizingAntigens, BacterialAntitoxinsBacterial ToxinsFemaleImmunization, SecondaryMiceMice, Inbred BALB COrthomyxoviridaeRabies virusVaccinationVaccinia virusanthrax toxinAnthrax VaccinesAntibodies, BacterialAntibodies, NeutralizingAntigens, BacterialAntitoxinsBacterial Toxins

Identifiers

PMID20504926
PMCPMC2916528
OpenAlexW2099124431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.