ArticleCough (London, England)2010
Validation of an ambulatory cough detection and counting application using voluntary cough under different conditions.
Article in Cough (London, England), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Cough Frequency Monitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) · 2026Pooled it
- Beyond fingerprint and voice print: cough sequence sound for identity verification.npj health systems · 2026Article
- Article
- Development of a Miniaturized Mechanoacoustic Sensor for Continuous, Objective Cough Detection, Characterization and Physiologic Monitoring in Children With Cystic Fibrosis.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2024Article
- Nighttime Continuous Contactless Smartphone-Based Cough Monitoring for the Ward: Validation Study.JMIR formative research · 2023Article
- Validation of a small cough detector.ERJ open research · 2023Article
- Enabling effective breathing sound analysis for automated diagnosis of lung diseases.Smart health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022Article
- Past and Trends in Cough Sound Acquisition, Automatic Detection and Automatic Classification: A Comparative Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Development and technical validation of a smartphone-based pediatric cough detection algorithm.Pediatric pulmonology · 2022Article
- Non-Contact Measurements of Electrocardiogram and Cough-Associated Electromyogram from the Neck Using In-Pillow Common Cloth Electrodes: A Proof-of-Concept Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Methods for assessing cough sensitivity.Journal of thoracic disease · 2020Review
- The present and future of cough counting tools.Journal of thoracic disease · 2020Review
- Automatic Recognition, Segmentation, and Sex Assignment of Nocturnal Asthmatic Coughs and Cough Epochs in Smartphone Audio Recordings: Observational Field Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- A Comprehensive Survey of Enabling and Emerging Technologies for Social Distancing-Part II: Emerging Technologies and Open Issues.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2020Article
- Cough dynamics in adults receiving tuberculosis treatment.PloS one · 2020Article
- Dynamics of Cough Frequency in Adults Undergoing Treatment for Pulmonary Tuberculosis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2017Article
- Article
- Targeting TRP channels for chronic cough: from bench to bedside.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2015Review
- An update on measurement and monitoring of cough: what are the important study endpoints?Journal of thoracic disease · 2014Review
- Data reduction for cough studies using distribution of audio frequency content.Cough (London, England) · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile cough is an important defence mechanism of the respiratory system, its chronic presence is bothersome and may indicate the presence of a serious disease. We hereby describe the validation process of a novel cough detection and counting technology (PulmoTrack-CC, KarmelSonix, Haifa, Israel).
methodsTracheal and chest wall sounds, ambient sounds and chest motion were digitally recorded, using the PulmoTrack(R) hardware, from healthy volunteers coughing voluntarily while (a) laying supine, (b) sitting, (c) sitting with strong ambient noise, (d) walking, and (e) climbing stairs, a total of 25 minutes per subject. The cough monitoring algorithm was applied to the recorded data to detect and count coughs.The detection algorithm first searches for cough 'candidates' by identifying loud sounds with a cough pattern, followed by a secondary verification process based on detection of specific characteristics of cough. The recorded data were independently and blindly evaluated by trained experts who listened to the sounds and visually reviewed them on a sonogram display.The validation process was based on two methods: (i) Referring to an expert consensus as gold standard, and comparing each cough detected by the algorithm to the expert marking, we marked True and False, positive and negative detections.These values were used to evaluate the specificity and sensitivity of the cough monitoring system. (ii) Counting the number of coughs in longer segments (t = 60 sec, n = 300) and plotting the cough count vs. the corresponding experts' count whereby the linear regression equation, the regression coefficient (R2) and the joint-distribution density Bland-Altman plots could be determined.
resultsData were recorded from 12 volunteers undergoing the complete protocol. The overall Specificity for cough events was 94% and the Sensitivity was 96%, with similar values found for all conditions, except for the stair climbing stage where the Specificity was 87% with Sensitivity of 97%. The regression equation between the PulmoTrack-CC cough event counts and the Experts' determination was with R2 of 0.94. DISCUSSION: This validation scheme provides an objective and quantitative assessment method of a cough counting algorithm in a range of realistic situations that simulate ambulatory monitoring of cough. The ability to detect voluntary coughs under acoustically challenging ambient conditions may represent a useful step towards a clinically applicable automatic cough detector.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.