Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20504231›Full record

SynthesisClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2010

Treatment outcomes among patients with extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Karen R Jacobson, Dylan B Tierney, Christie Y Jeon, Carole D Mitnick, Megan B Murray

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Systematic review of clofazimine for the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2013
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Molecular Analysis of Anti-Tuberculosis Drug Resistance ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Beijing genotype ofNew microbes and new infections · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Karen R JacobsonDivision of Infectious Disease, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA. krjacobson@partners.org
Dylan B Tierney
Christie Y Jeon
Carole D Mitnick
Megan B Murray

Funding

INFECTIOUS DISEASE AND BASIC MICROBIOLOGICAL MECHANISMST32AI007061 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Marcia B Goldberg · 1985 to 2026
$12.1M
Multidisciplinary HIV Training ProgramT32AI007387 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Daniel R. Kuritzkes · 1990 to 2026
$8.8M
Clinical Outcomes Research in MDR-TBK01AI065836 · NIAID · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI MITNICK, CAROLE D. · 2006 to 2008
$346k
NIAID NIH HHS K01 AI065836NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007061NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007387
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background. The treatment of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR TB) presents a major challenge. Second-line antimycobacterial drugs are less effective, more toxic, and more costly than first-line agents, and XDR TB strains are, by definition, resistant to the most potent second-line options: the injectable agents and fluoroquinolones. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess XDR TB treatment outcomes and to identify therapeutic approaches associated with favorable responses.

methodsWe searched PubMed and EMBASE databases to identify studies conducted through May 2009 that report XDR TB treatment outcomes.

resultsThe search yielded 13 observational studies covering 560 patients, of whom 43.7% (95% confidence interval, 32.8%-54.5%) experienced favorable outcomes, defined as either cure or treatment completion, and 20.8% (95% confidence interval, 14.2%-27.3%) died. Random effects meta-analysis and meta-regression showed that studies in which a higher proportion of patients received a later-generation fluoroquinolone reported a higher proportion of favorable treatment outcomes (P=.012).

conclusionsThis meta-analysis provides the first empirical evidence that the use of later-generation fluoroquinolones for the treatment of XDR TB significantly improves treatment outcomes, even though drug-susceptibility testing demonstrates resistance to a representative fluoroquinolone. These results suggest that the addition of later-generation fluoroquinolones to XDR TB regimens may improve treatment outcomes and should be systematically evaluated in well-designed clinical studies.

Indexed as

Antitubercular AgentsDrug Therapy, CombinationEmpirical ResearchExtensively Drug-Resistant TuberculosisFluoroquinolonesHumansMycobacterium tuberculosisTreatment OutcomeAntitubercular AgentsFluoroquinolones

Identifiers

PMID20504231
PMCPMC4013786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.