Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20503107›Full record

SynthesisMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2011

MDM2 309 T/G polymorphism is associated with colorectal cancer risk especially in Asians: a meta-analysis.

Fang Fang, Xiao-Jia Yu, Lu Yu, Lei Yao

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fang FangState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Institute of Genetics, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, 200433, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Xiao-Jia Yu
Lu Yu
Lei Yao
Fudan University · CNState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The murine double minute 2 (MDM2) gene encodes an important regulator which mainly functions as an E3 ligase. The role of the MDM2 protein in the P53 pathway has been especially well-studied. In this study, our aim was to explore the relationship between MDM2 gene 309 T/G polymorphism and colorectal cancer risk. Performing both the overall meta-analysis and the subgroup meta-analysis based on ethnicity and source of controls with a total of 7 eligible studies (2,543 cases and 2,115 controls in all), we detected a significant colorectal cancer risk variation for TG versus GG (OR=0.73, 95% CI=0.62-0.86) in the overall analysis and another significant colorectal cancer risk variation for TG versus GG (OR=0.70, 95% CI=0.59-0.83) in the population-based controls' subgroup as well. Moreover, in the subgroup analysis based on ethnicity, significant associations were observed for all genetic models in Asians (OR=0.51, 95% CI=0.41-0.64 for TT versus GG; OR=0.64, 95% CI=0.53-0.78 for TG versus GG; OR=0.59, 95% CI=0.49-0.71 for dominant model; OR=0.69, 95% CI=0.57-0.82 for recessive model), while in Caucasians there was no obvious association. In summary, according to the results of our meta-analysis, the MDM2 309 G allele probably acts as a colorectal cancer risk factor, especially in Asians.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseasePolymorphism, Single NucleotideAsian PeopleColorectal NeoplasmsHumansProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2Risk FactorsMDM2 protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2

Identifiers

PMID20503107
OpenAlexW2013720038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.