Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20502814›Full record

ReviewThe Analyst2010

Analytical strategies for detecting nanoparticle-protein interactions.

Liwen Li, Qingxin Mu, Bin Zhang, Bing Yan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Analyst, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Liwen LiSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, 250100, China.
Qingxin Mu
Bin Zhang
Bing Yan

Funding

Viral Vector Technology (VVTSR)P30CA021765 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI CHARLES ROBERTS · 1985 to 2026
$166.9M
UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH AND SEMINARSP20RR016457 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND · PI SHAKARIAN, ALISON M · 2001 to 2011
$35.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA021765NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR016457
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A significant increase in biomedical applications of nanomaterials and their potential toxicity demands versatile analytical techniques to determine protein-nanoparticle (NP) interactions. These diverse analytical techniques are reviewed. Spectroscopic methods play a significant role in studying binding affinity, binding ratio, and binding mechanisms. To elucidate NP-proteome interactions, chromatography and electrophoresis techniques are applied to separate NP-bound proteins and matrix assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) to identify these proteins. Since NP-protein binding is a dynamic event, surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) are methods of choice to study the kinetics of NP-protein binding.

Indexed as

ElectrophoresisKineticsMass SpectrometryNanoparticlesProtein BindingProteinsSpectrophotometrySurface Plasmon ResonanceProteins

Identifiers

PMID20502814
PMCPMC4810802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.