Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20502795›Full record

ReviewChemical Society reviews2010

Electrochemical nitric oxide sensors for physiological measurements.

Benjamin J Privett, Jae Ho Shin, Mark H Schoenfisch

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical Society reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 179 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Therapeutic Gases in Biomedicine: Updates on Nitric Oxide and Beyond.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Benjamin J PrivettDepartment of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Jae Ho Shin
Mark H Schoenfisch
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USKwangwoon University · KR

Funding

Nitric Oxide-Releasing Glucose BiosensorsR01EB000708 · NIBIB · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SCHOENFISCH, MARK H · 2002 to 2011
$3.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS EB000708NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB000708
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The important biological roles of nitric oxide (NO) have prompted the development of analytical techniques capable of sensitive and selective detection of NO. Electrochemical sensing, more than any other NO detection method, embodies the parameters necessary for quantifying NO in challenging physiological environments such as blood and the brain. In this tutorial review, we provide a broad overview of the field of electrochemical NO sensors, including design, fabrication, and analytical performance characteristics. Both electrochemical sensors and biological applications are detailed.

Indexed as

CatalysisElectrochemical TechniquesNitric OxideOxidation-ReductionNitric Oxide

Identifiers

PMID20502795
PMCPMC3569000
OpenAlexW2153933652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.