Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20502635›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2010

GC-biased evolution near human accelerated regions.

Sol Katzman, Andrew D Kern, Katherine S Pollard, Sofie R Salama, David Haussler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Genetic Mechanisms Underlying Cortical Evolution in Mammals.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Great ape genomics.ILAR journal · 2013
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sol KatzmanDepartment of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, United States of America.
Andrew D Kern
Katherine S Pollard
Sofie R Salama
David Haussler

Funding

The UCSC ENCODE Data Coordination CenterU41HG004568 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI KENT, WILLIAM JAMES · 2007 to 2011
$7.7M
What Made Us Human?R01GM082901 · NIGMS · J. DAVID GLADSTONE INSTITUTES · PI POLLARD, KATHERINE S. · 2008 to 2011
$1.4M
The Role of HAR1 Non-coding RNA's in Cortical DevelopmentR03DA026061 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI SALAMA, SOFIE REDA · 2008 to 2009
$290k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNHGRI NIH HHS U41 HG004568NIDA NIH HHS 1R03DA026061-01NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA026061NIGMS NIH HHS GM82901NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM082901
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regions of the genome that have been the target of positive selection specifically along the human lineage are of special importance in human biology. We used high throughput sequencing combined with methods to enrich human genomic samples for particular targets to obtain the sequence of 22 chromosomal samples at high depth in 40 kb neighborhoods of 49 previously identified 100-400 bp elements that show evidence for human accelerated evolution. In addition to selection, the pattern of nucleotide substitutions in several of these elements suggested an historical bias favoring the conversion of weak (A or T) alleles into strong (G or C) alleles. Here we found strong evidence in the derived allele frequency spectra of many of these 40 kb regions for ongoing weak-to-strong fixation bias. Comparison of the nucleotide composition at polymorphic loci to the composition at sites of fixed substitutions additionally reveals the signature of historical weak-to-strong fixation bias in a subset of these regions. Most of the regions with evidence for historical bias do not also have signatures of ongoing bias, suggesting that the evolutionary forces generating weak-to-strong bias are not constant over time. To investigate the role of selection in shaping these regions, we analyzed the spatial pattern of polymorphism in our samples. We found no significant evidence for selective sweeps, possibly because the signal of such sweeps has decayed beyond the power of our tests to detect them. Together, these results do not rule out functional roles for the observed changes in these regions-indeed there is good evidence that the first two are functional elements in humans-but they suggest that a fixation process (such as biased gene conversion) that is biased at the nucleotide level, but is otherwise selectively neutral, could be an important evolutionary force at play in them, both historically and at present.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGC Rich SequenceChromosome MappingGene FrequencyHumansMutation

Identifiers

PMID20502635
PMCPMC2873926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.