Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20502436›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2010

Laser capture microdissection of Drosophila peripheral neurons.

Eswar Prasad R Iyer, Daniel N Cox

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Laser capture microdissection.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. SIVQ-LCM protocol for the ArcturusXT instrument.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2014
    Article
  7. Article
  8. 2D and 3D chromosome painting in malaria mosquitoes.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2014
    Article
  9. Small-volume analysis of cell-cell signaling molecules in the brain.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2014
    Review
  10. Laser capture microdissection for protein and NanoString RNA analysis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2013
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Effect of immunohistochemistry on molecular analysis of tissue samples: implications for microdissection technologies.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society · 2011
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Development of the embryonic and larval peripheral nervous system of Drosophila.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eswar Prasad R IyerDepartment of Molecular and Microbiology, George Mason University, USA.
Daniel N Cox

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dendritic arborization (da) neurons of the Drosophila peripheral nervous system (PNS) provide an excellent model system in which to investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying class-specific dendrite morphogenesis. To facilitate molecular analyses of class-specific da neuron development, it is vital to obtain these cells in a pure population. Although a range of different cell, and tissue-specific RNA isolation techniques exist for Drosophila cells, including magnetic bead based cell purification, Fluorescent Activated Cell Sorting (FACS), and RNA binding protein based strategies, none of these methods can be readily utilized for isolating single or multiple class-specific Drosophila da neurons with a high degree of spatial precision. Laser Capture Microdissection (LCM) has emerged as an extremely powerful tool that can be used to isolate specific cell types from tissue sections with a high degree of spatial resolution and accuracy. RNA obtained from isolated cells can then be used for analyses including qRT-PCR and microarray expression profiling within a given cell type. To date, LCM has not been widely applied in the analysis of Drosophila tissues and cells, including da neurons at the third instar larval stage of development. Here we present our optimized protocol for isolation of Drosophila da neurons using the infrared (IR) class of LCM. This method allows for the capture of single, class-specific or multiple da neurons with high specificity and spatial resolution. Age-matched third instar larvae expressing a UAS-mCD8::GFP transgene under the control of either the class IV da neuron specific ppk-GAL4 driver or the pan-da neuron specific 21-7-GAL4 driver were used for these experiments. RNA obtained from the isolated da neurons is of very high quality and can be directly used for downstream applications, including qRT-PCR or microarray analyses. Furthermore, this LCM protocol can be readily adapted to capture other Drosophila cell types a various stages of development dependent upon the cell type specific, GAL4-driven expression pattern of GFP.

Indexed as

AnimalsDendritic CellsDrosophilaMicrodissectionNeuronsPeripheral Nervous System

Identifiers

PMID20502436
PMCPMC3152851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.