Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20502299›Full record

SynthesisObstetrics and gynecology2010

Ectopic pregnancy and emergency contraceptive pills: a systematic review.

Kelly Cleland, Elizabeth Raymond, James Trussell, Linan Cheng, Haoping Zhu

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cost-effectiveness of emergency contraception options over 1 year.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. State of emergency contraception in the U.S., 2018.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2018
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kelly ClelandFrom Office of Population Research, Princeton University, Wallace Hall, Princeton, New Jersey; Family Health International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina; The Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, United Kingdom; Shanghai Institute of Planned Parenthood Research, Shanghai, People's Republic of China; Minhang Central Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Elizabeth Raymond
James Trussell
Linan Cheng
Haoping Zhu
Shanghai Institute of Planned Parenthood Research · CN

Funding

Infrastructure for Population Research at PrincetonR24HD047879 · NICHD · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI MASSEY, DOUGLAS S · 2004 to 2013
$7.3M
NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD047879
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the existing data to estimate the rate of ectopic pregnancy among emergency contraceptive pill treatment failures. DATA SOURCES: Our initial reference list was generated from a 2008 Cochrane review of emergency contraception. In August 2009, we searched Biosys Previews, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Medline, Global Health Database, Health Source: Popline, and Wanfang Data (a Chinese database).

methodsThis study included data from 136 studies, which followed a defined population of women treated one time with emergency contraceptive pills (either mifepristone or levonorgestrel) and in which the number and location of pregnancies were ascertained.

resultsData from each article were abstracted independently by two reviewers. In the studies of mifepristone, 3 of 494 (0.6%) pregnancies were ectopic; in the levonorgestrel studies, 3 of 307 (1%) were ectopic.

conclusionThe rate of ectopic pregnancy when treatment with emergency contraceptive pills fails does not exceed the rate observed in the general population. Because emergency contraceptive pills are effective in lowering the risk of pregnancy, their use will reduce the chance that an act of intercourse will result in ectopic pregnancy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Indexed as

Contraceptives, PostcoitalFemaleHumansLevonorgestrelMifepristonePregnancyPregnancy, EctopicContraceptives, PostcoitalLevonorgestrelMifepristone

Identifiers

PMID20502299
PMCPMC3903002
OpenAlexW1966446396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.