ArticleNucleic acids research2010
myExperiment: a repository and social network for the sharing of bioinformatics workflows.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
73 citing papers in PubMed.
- BioFlow-Insight: facilitating reuse of Nextflow workflows with structure reconstruction and visualization.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2024Article
- An Automated Workflow Composition System for Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Metabolomics Data Processing.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2023Article
- Developing and reusing bioinformatics data analysis pipelines using scientific workflow systems.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Review
- A Checklist for Reproducible Computational Analysis in Clinical Metabolomics Research.Metabolites · 2022Review
- Bioinformatic workflow fragment discovery leveraging the social-aware knowledge graph.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Laniakea@ReCaS: exploring the potential of customisable Galaxy on-demand instances as a cloud-based service.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Publishing reproducible dynamic kinetic models.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Perspectives on automated composition of workflows in the life sciences.F1000Research · 2021Article
- Knowledge and Attitudes Among Life Scientists Toward Reproducibility Within Journal Articles: A Research Survey.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2021Article
- Organizing genome engineering for the gigabase scale.Nature communications · 2020Review
- FAIR digital objects in environmental and life sciences should comprise workflow operation design data and method information for repeatability of study setups and reproducibility of results.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2020Article
- Sharing interoperable workflow provenance: A review of best practices and their practical application in CWLProv.GigaScience · 2019Article
- BioExcel Building Blocks, a software library for interoperable biomolecular simulation workflows.Scientific data · 2019Article
- Social support for collaboration and group awareness in life science research teams.Source code for biology and medicine · 2019Article
- Enabling precision medicine via standard communication of HTS provenance, analysis, and results.PLoS biology · 2018Article
- Improving data workflow systems with cloud services and use of open data for bioinformatics research.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2018Review
- GeneSeqToFamily: a Galaxy workflow to find gene families based on the Ensembl Compara GeneTrees pipeline.GigaScience · 2018Article
- BioWorkbench: a high-performance framework for managing and analyzing bioinformatics experiments.PeerJ · 2018Article
- The CoLoMoTo Interactive Notebook: Accessible and Reproducible Computational Analyses for Qualitative Biological Networks.Frontiers in physiology · 2018Article
- The RNA workbench: best practices for RNA and high-throughput sequencing bioinformatics in Galaxy.Nucleic acids research · 2017Article
13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
myExperiment (http://www.myexperiment.org) is an online research environment that supports the social sharing of bioinformatics workflows. These workflows are procedures consisting of a series of computational tasks using web services, which may be performed on data from its retrieval, integration and analysis, to the visualization of the results. As a public repository of workflows, myExperiment allows anybody to discover those that are relevant to their research, which can then be reused and repurposed to their specific requirements. Conversely, developers can submit their workflows to myExperiment and enable them to be shared in a secure manner. Since its release in 2007, myExperiment currently has over 3500 registered users and contains more than 1000 workflows. The social aspect to the sharing of these workflows is facilitated by registered users forming virtual communities bound together by a common interest or research project. Contributors of workflows can build their reputation within these communities by receiving feedback and credit from individuals who reuse their work. Further documentation about myExperiment including its REST web service is available from http://wiki.myexperiment.org. Feedback and requests for support can be sent to bugs@myexperiment.org.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.