ArticleJournal of women's health (2002)2010
Proceedings from the scientific symposium: Sex differences in cardiovascular disease and implications for therapies.
Article in Journal of women's health (2002), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- The impact of patient sex on the response to intramyocardial mesenchymal stem cell administration in patients with non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy.Cardiovascular research · 2020Trial
- Pharmacogenomics of estrogens on changes in carotid artery intima-medial thickness and coronary arterial calcification: Kronos Early Estrogen Prevention Study.Physiological genomics · 2016Trial
- Sex in cardiovascular disease: Why this biological variable should be considered in in vitro models.Science advances · 2024Review
- Editorial: Sex differences and cardiovascular therapeutics.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Sex differences in crude mortality rates and predictive value of intensive care unit-based scores when applied to the cardiac intensive care unit.European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care · 2020Article
- Working Together to Address Women's Health in Research and Drug Development: Summary of the 2017 Women's Health Congress Preconference Symposium.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2018Article
- Article
- Sex Differences in Circulating Progenitor Cells.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2017Article
- Gender Differences in Post-Traumatic Stress.BioResearch open access · 2017Article
- The Apoe(-/-) mouse model: a suitable model to study cardiovascular and respiratory diseases in the context of cigarette smoke exposure and harm reduction.Journal of translational medicine · 2016Review
- Strategies and methods to study female-specific cardiovascular health and disease: a guide for clinical scientists.Biology of sex differences · 2016Review
- Genetics of cardiovascular disease: Importance of sex and ethnicity.Atherosclerosis · 2015Review
- The diagnosis of CAD in women: addressing the unmet need - a report from the national expert roundtable meeting.Population health management · 2015Review
- Adult stem cell transplantation: is gender a factor in stemness?International journal of molecular sciences · 2014Review
- Sex differences in the treatment and outcome of patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention: a population-based study.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2014Article
- The battle of the sexes for stroke therapy: female- versus male-derived stem cells.CNS & neurological disorders drug targets · 2013Review
- Strategies and methods to study sex differences in cardiovascular structure and function: a guide for basic scientists.Biology of sex differences · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
unlabelledA consortium of investigator-thought leaders was convened at the Heart Institute at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center and produced the following summary points: POINT 1: Important sex differences exist in cardiovascular disease (CVD) that affect disease initiation, diagnosis, and treatment. IMPLICATION: Research that acknowledges these differences is needed to optimize outcomes in women and men. POINT 2: Atherosclerosis is qualitatively and quantitatively different in women and men; women demonstrate more plaque erosion and more diffuse plaque with less focal artery lumen intrusion. IMPLICATION: Evaluation of CVD strategies that include devices should be used to explore differing anatomical shapes and surfaces as well as differing drug coating and eluting strategies. POINT 3: Bone marrow progenitor cells (PCs) engraft differently based on the sex of the donor cell and the sex of the recipient. IMPLICATION: PC therapeutic studies need to consider the sex of cells of the source and the recipient. POINT 4: Women have a greater risk of venous but not arterial thrombosis compared with men, as well as more bleeding complications related to anticoagulant treatment. Several genes coding for proteins involved in hemostasis are regulated by sex hormones. IMPLICATIONS: Research should be aimed at evaluation of sex-based differences in response to anticoagulation based on genotype. POINT 5: Women and men can have differences in pharmacological response. IMPLICATION: Sex-specific pharmacogenomic studies should be included in pharmacological development. POINT 6: CVD progression results from an imbalance of cell injury and repair in part due to insufficient PC repair, which is affected by sex differences, where females have higher circulating levels of PCs with greater rates of tissue repair. IMPLICATION: CVD regenerative strategies should be directed at learning to deliver cells that shift the recipient balance from injury toward repair. CVD repair strategies should ideally be tested first in females to have the best chance of success for proof-of-concept.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.