Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20500123›Full record

ArticleJournal of women's health (2002)2010

Proceedings from the scientific symposium: Sex differences in cardiovascular disease and implications for therapies.

C Noel Bairey Merz, Saralyn Mark, Barbara D Boyan, Alice K Jacobs, Prediman K Shah, Leslee J Shaw, Doris Taylor, Eduardo Marbán

Open access · greenAbstract readConference Proceedings
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of women's health (2002), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Editorial: Sex differences and cardiovascular therapeutics.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Sex Differences in Circulating Progenitor Cells.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2017
    Article
  10. Gender Differences in Post-Traumatic Stress.BioResearch open access · 2017
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Adult stem cell transplantation: is gender a factor in stemness?International journal of molecular sciences · 2014
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

C Noel Bairey MerzWomen's Heart Center, Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, 444 S. San Vincente Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA. merz@cshs.org
Saralyn Mark
Barbara D Boyan
Alice K Jacobs
Prediman K Shah
Leslee J Shaw
Doris Taylor
Eduardo Marbán
Boston University · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USEmory University · USGeorgetown University · USUniversity of Minnesota System · US

Funding

ZONA-FREE HAMSTER OVA ASSAY AS AN INDICATOR OF MALE FERTILITYM01RR000425 · NCRR · LUNDQUIST INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL INNOVATION AT HARBOR-UCLA MEDICAL CENTER · PI ANDERSON, GAIL V · 1985 to 2011
$74.2M
Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Coronary Vascular DysfunctionR01HL090957 · NHLBI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI BAIREY MERZ, CATHLEEN NOEL, PEPINE, CARL J · 2008 to 2013
$3.5M
ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE IN WOMEN--CLINICAL CENTERN01HV068163 · HV · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI PEPINE, CARL J · 1996 to 2001
$386k
ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE IN WOMEN-CLINICAL CENTERN01HV068161 · HV · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI ROGERS, WILLIAM J · 1996 to 2000
$245k
Cardiovascular Events in Women's Ischemia Syndrome EvaluationR03AG032631 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KELSEY, SHERYL F · 2008 to 2009
$137k
EVAL OF ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE IN WOMEN-CLINICAL CTR-N01HV68162-268068162N01HV068162 · HV · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · 1996 to 2005
–
EVAL OF ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE IN WOMEN-CLINICAL CTRN01HV068164 · HV · ALLEGHENY-SINGER RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI REICHEK, NATHANIEL · 1996 to 2001
–
NCRR NIH HHS M01-RR00425NHLBI NIH HHS N01-HV-68161NHLBI NIH HHS N01-HV-68162NHLBI NIH HHS N01-HV-68163NHLBI NIH HHS N01-HV-68164NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL090957-01A1NIA NIH HHS R03 AG032631-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledA consortium of investigator-thought leaders was convened at the Heart Institute at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center and produced the following summary points: POINT 1: Important sex differences exist in cardiovascular disease (CVD) that affect disease initiation, diagnosis, and treatment. IMPLICATION: Research that acknowledges these differences is needed to optimize outcomes in women and men. POINT 2: Atherosclerosis is qualitatively and quantitatively different in women and men; women demonstrate more plaque erosion and more diffuse plaque with less focal artery lumen intrusion. IMPLICATION: Evaluation of CVD strategies that include devices should be used to explore differing anatomical shapes and surfaces as well as differing drug coating and eluting strategies. POINT 3: Bone marrow progenitor cells (PCs) engraft differently based on the sex of the donor cell and the sex of the recipient. IMPLICATION: PC therapeutic studies need to consider the sex of cells of the source and the recipient. POINT 4: Women have a greater risk of venous but not arterial thrombosis compared with men, as well as more bleeding complications related to anticoagulant treatment. Several genes coding for proteins involved in hemostasis are regulated by sex hormones. IMPLICATIONS: Research should be aimed at evaluation of sex-based differences in response to anticoagulation based on genotype. POINT 5: Women and men can have differences in pharmacological response. IMPLICATION: Sex-specific pharmacogenomic studies should be included in pharmacological development. POINT 6: CVD progression results from an imbalance of cell injury and repair in part due to insufficient PC repair, which is affected by sex differences, where females have higher circulating levels of PCs with greater rates of tissue repair. IMPLICATION: CVD regenerative strategies should be directed at learning to deliver cells that shift the recipient balance from injury toward repair. CVD repair strategies should ideally be tested first in females to have the best chance of success for proof-of-concept.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesAtherosclerosisFemaleHumansMaleSex FactorsStem Cell Transplantation

Identifiers

PMID20500123
PMCPMC2940456
OpenAlexW2083158649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.