Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20498460›Full record

ArticleRNA (New York, N.Y.)2010

On the significance of an RNA tertiary structure prediction.

Christine E Hajdin, Feng Ding, Nikolay V Dokholyan, Kevin M Weeks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RNA (New York, N.Y.), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Has AlphaFold3 achieved success for RNA?Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. RNA 3D Structure Comparison Using RNA-Puzzles Toolkit.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christine E HajdinDepartment of Chemistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3290, USA.
Feng Ding
Nikolay V Dokholyan
Kevin M Weeks

Funding

Retroviral Genomic RNA Dimer Structure and FunctionR01GM064803 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI WEEKS, KEVIN M · 2002 to 2016
$3.7M
Protein Misfolding and AggregationR01GM080742 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DOKHOLYAN, NIKOLAY · 2007 to 2015
$2.8M
ERROR PRONE REPLICATIVE BYPASS OF PLATINUM ADDUCTSR01CA084480 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DOKHOLYAN, NIKOLAY · 2000 to 2008
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS CA084480NCI NIH HHS R01 CA084480NIGMS NIH HHS GM064803NIGMS NIH HHS GM080742NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM064803NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM080742
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tertiary structure prediction is important for understanding structure-function relationships for RNAs whose structures are unknown and for characterizing RNA states recalcitrant to direct analysis. However, it is unknown what root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) corresponds to a statistically significant RNA tertiary structure prediction. We use discrete molecular dynamics to generate RNA-like folds for structures up to 161 nucleotides (nt) that have complex tertiary interactions and then determine the RMSD distribution between these decoys. These distributions are Gaussian-like. The mean RMSD increases with RNA length and is smaller if secondary structure constraints are imposed while generating decoys. The compactness of RNA molecules with true tertiary folds is intermediate between closely packed spheres and a freely jointed chain. We use this scaling relationship to define an expression relating RMSD with the confidence that a structure prediction is better than that expected by chance. This is the prediction significance, and corresponds to a P-value. For a 100-nt RNA, the RMSD of predicted structures should be within 25 A of the accepted structure to reach the P <or= 0.01 level if the secondary structure is predicted de novo and within 14 A if secondary structure information is used as a constraint. This significance approach should be useful for evaluating diverse RNA structure prediction and molecular modeling algorithms.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsNucleic Acid ConformationModels, ChemicalMolecular Dynamics SimulationRNARNA

Identifiers

PMID20498460
PMCPMC2885683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.