Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20498388›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2010

Phase II evaluation of sorafenib in advanced and metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Southwest Oncology Group Study S0420.

Stephen K Williamson, James Moon, Chao H Huang, Perry P Guaglianone, Michael LeBlanc, Gregory T Wolf, Susan G Urba

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stephen K WilliamsonUniversity of Kansas Cancer Center, Hematology/Oncology Division, Westwood, KS 66205, USA. swilliam@kumc.edu
James Moon
Chao H Huang
Perry P Guaglianone
Michael LeBlanc
Gregory T Wolf
Susan G Urba

Funding

SWOG - Foreign Accrual under UMiU10CA032102 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BLANKE, CHARLES D. · 1985 to 2013
$141.3M
SOUTHWEST ONCOLOGY GROUP--STATISTICAL CENTERU10CA038926 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI LEBLANC, MICHAEL L. · 1985 to 2013
$69.8M
SOUTHEAST CANCER CONTROL COSORTIUM, INCU10CA045808 · NCI · SOUTHEAST CLINICAL ONCOL RES CONSORTIUM · PI ATKINS, JAMES NORMAN · 1987 to 2013
$26.6M
COMMUNITY CLINICAL ONCOLOGY PROGRAMU10CA035431 · NCI · VIA CHRISTI REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER · PI DAKHIL, SHAKER R · 1985 to 2014
$24.0M
UPSTATE CAROLINA COMMUNITY CLINICAL ONCOLOGY PROGRAMU10CA035119 · NCI · SPARTANBURG REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER · PI BEARDEN, JAMES D · 1985 to 2013
$21.5M
COMMUNITY CLINICAL ONCOLOGY PROGRAMU10CA045807 · NCI · VOLUNTARY HOSPITALS OF AMERICA-ILLINOIS · PI WADE, JAMES L · 1987 to 2014
$16.0M
DAYTON CLINICAL ONCOLOGY PROGRAMU10CA035090 · NCI · KETTERING MEDICAL CENTER · PI GROSS, HOWARD M · 1985 to 2014
$12.0M
Montana Cancer Consortium CCOPU10CA067575 · NCI · MONTANA CANCER CONSORTIUM · PI MARCHELLO, BENJAMIN T. · 1995 to 2013
$6.5M
SOUTHWEST ONCOLOGY GROUPU10CA011083 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI FRIEDBERG, JONATHAN W · 1985 to 2013
$5.5M
SOUTHWEST ONCOLOGY GROUPU10CA020319 · NCI · SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER, FIRST HILL · PI GOODMAN, GARY E · 1985 to 2013
$5.1M
SOUTHWEST ONCOLOGY GROUP/UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVISU10CA046441 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI GANDARA, DAVID R · 1988 to 2013
$4.8M
ST LOUIS COMMUNITY CLINICAL ONCOLOGY PROGRAMU10CA035128 · NCI · ST.LOUIS-CAPE GIRARDEAU CCOP · PI SLECKMAN, BETHANY · 1985 to 2012
$4.5M
NCI NIH HHS CA11083NCI NIH HHS CA12644NCI NIH HHS CA16385NCI NIH HHS CA20319NCI NIH HHS CA35090NCI NIH HHS CA35128NCI NIH HHS CA42777NCI NIH HHS CA45808NCI NIH HHS CA52654NCI NIH HHS CA58658NCI NIH HHS CA76448NCI NIH HHS N01 CA032102NCI NIH HHS N01 CA035119NCI NIH HHS N01 CA035431NCI NIH HHS N01 CA038926NCI NIH HHS N01 CA045807NCI NIH HHS N01 CA046441NCI NIH HHS N01 CA067575NCI NIH HHS U10 CA011083NCI NIH HHS U10 CA012644NCI NIH HHS U10 CA016385NCI NIH HHS U10 CA020319NCI NIH HHS U10 CA032102NCI NIH HHS U10 CA035090NCI NIH HHS U10 CA035119NCI NIH HHS U10 CA035128NCI NIH HHS U10 CA035431NCI NIH HHS U10 CA038926NCI NIH HHS U10 CA042777NCI NIH HHS U10 CA045807NCI NIH HHS U10 CA045808NCI NIH HHS U10 CA046441NCI NIH HHS U10 CA052654NCI NIH HHS U10 CA067575
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe conducted a phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of single-agent sorafenib in chemotherapy-naïve patients with metastatic or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). The primary end point was response probability (ie, confirmed complete and partial response [PR]). PATIENTS AND

methodsChemotherapy-naïve patients with metastatic, persistent, or recurrent SCCHN who received one induction or fewer or received an adjuvant chemotherapy regimen, who had adequate organ function, and who had a performance status <or= 1 were eligible. Sorafenib was administered orally at 400 mg twice daily on a continuous basis in 28-day cycles. Responses were evaluated according to RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors).

resultsSorafenib was generally well tolerated. Of the 41 eligible patients assessed for adverse events, one experienced a grade 4 adverse event as a result of an asymptomatic pulmonary embolus. The most common grades 2 to 3 adverse events were fatigue, anorexia, stomatitis/oral pain, abdominal pain, hand-foot syndrome, weight loss, and hypertension. There was one confirmed PR and two unconfirmed PRs. The estimated confirmed response probability was 2% (95% CI, 0% to 13%). The estimated median progression-free survival was 4 months (95% CI, 2 to 4 months), and the estimated median overall survival was 9 months (95% CI, 7 to 14 months).

conclusionSorafenib was well tolerated. Although response was poor, progression-free and overall survival times compare favorably with previous Southwest Oncology Group, phase II, single-agent trials.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsBenzenesulfonatesCarcinoma, Squamous CellDisease-Free SurvivalDrug EvaluationFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNiacinamidePhenylurea CompoundsAntineoplastic AgentsBenzenesulfonatesNiacinamidePhenylurea CompoundsPyridinesSorafenib

Identifiers

PMID20498388
PMCPMC2903329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.