Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20498325›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2010

Risk factors for fluconazole-resistant candidemia.

José Garnacho-Montero, Ana Díaz-Martín, Emilio García-Cabrera, Maite Ruiz Pérez de Pipaón, Clara Hernández-Caballero, Javier Aznar-Martín, José M Cisneros, Carlos Ortiz-Leyba

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. First Case of Candidemia With Fluconazole-ResistantCase reports in infectious diseases · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. High frequency ofCurrent medical mycology · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Isolation ofCurrent medical mycology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

José Garnacho-MonteroCritical Care and Emergency Department, Intensive Care Unit, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Avenida Manuel Siurot s/n, Seville 41013, Spain. jose.garnacho.sspa@juntadeandalucia.es
Ana Díaz-Martín
Emilio García-Cabrera
Maite Ruiz Pérez de Pipaón
Clara Hernández-Caballero
Javier Aznar-Martín
José M Cisneros
Carlos Ortiz-Leyba
Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío · ESUniversidad de Sevilla · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies have sought to determine the risk factors associated with candidemia caused by non-albicans Candida spp. or with potentially fluconazole-resistant Candida spp. (C. glabrata and C. krusei). Non-albicans Candida strains are a heterogeneous group that includes species with different levels of virulence, and only a limited number of C. glabrata isolates are resistant to fluconazole. We set out to identify the risk factors associated with microbiologically proven fluconazole-resistant candidemia. A prospective study including adult patients with candidemia was performed. Data were collected on patient demographics; underlying diseases; exposure to corticosteroids, antibiotics, or fluconazole; and invasive procedures. Risk factors associated either with non-albicans Candida spp. or potentially fluconazole-resistant Candida spp. (C. glabrata or C. krusei) or with Candida spp. with microbiologically confirmed fluconazole resistance were assessed using logistic regressions. We included 226 candidemia episodes. Non-albicans Candida isolates accounted for 53.1% of the fungal isolates, but only 18.2% of the cases were caused by potentially fluconazole-resistant organisms. Thirty isolates exhibited microbiologically confirmed fluconazole resistance. The multivariate analysis revealed that independent predictors associated with fluconazole-resistant Candida spp. were neutropenia (odds ratio [OR]=4.94; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.50 to 16.20; P=0.008), chronic renal disease (OR=4.82; 95% CI=1.47 to 15.88; P=0.01), and previous fluconazole exposure (OR=5.09; 95% CI=1.66 to 15.6; P=0.004). Independently significant variables associated with non-albicans Candida bloodstream infection or with potentially fluconazole-resistant Candida spp. did not include previous fluconazole exposure. We concluded that prior fluconazole treatment is an independent risk factor only for candidemia caused by microbiologically confirmed fluconazole resistant species. Our findings may be of value for selecting empirical antifungal therapy.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, FungalAntifungal AgentsCandidaCandida albicansCandidiasisFluconazoleFungemiaHospitals, UrbanHumansLogistic ModelsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMultivariate AnalysisProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSpainAntifungal AgentsFluconazole

Identifiers

PMID20498325
PMCPMC2916332
OpenAlexW2101234999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.