Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20496165›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2011

Comprehensive screen of genetic variation in DNA repair pathway genes and postmenopausal breast cancer risk.

Genevieve M Monsees, Peter Kraft, Stephen J Chanock, David J Hunter, Jiali Han

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Replicative DNA polymerase mutations in cancer.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2014
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. DNA replication fidelity and cancer.Seminars in cancer biology · 2010
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Genevieve M MonseesProgram in Molecular and Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, 665 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Peter Kraft
Stephen J Chanock
David J Hunter
Jiali Han
Boston University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Interdisciplinary Training in Genes and the EnvironmentT32ES016645 · NIEHS · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI LEE, CHIH-HAO · 2008 to 2018
$4.0M
Prospective Study of DNA Repair Gene Variants in Breast CancerR01CA118447 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI HAN, JIALI · 2007 to 2009
$991k
NCI NIH HHS CA118447NCI NIH HHS R01 CA118447NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES016645NIEHS NIH HHS T32-ES016645-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mistakes in DNA repair can result in sustained damage and genetic instability. We comprehensively evaluated common variants in DNA repair pathway genes for their association with postmenopausal breast cancer risk with and without respect to estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) subtypes. In this study of 1,145 prospectively ascertained breast cancer cases and 1,142 matched controls from the Nurses' Health Study Cancer Genetic Markers of Susceptibility project, we evaluated 1,314 common genetic variants in 68 candidate genes. These variants were chosen to represent five DNA repair pathways including base excision repair, nucleotide excision repair, double-strand break repair (homologous recombination and non-homologous end-joining), direct reversal repair, and mismatch repair, along with candidate DNA polymerases, Fanconi Anemia complementation groups, and other genes relevant to DNA damage recognition and response. Main effects, pathway effects, and pair-wise interactions were evaluated using Logistic Regression, and the Admixture Maximum Likelihood (AML) and Kernel Machine tests. Eight linked loci within XRCC4 were associated with susceptibility to PR- breast cancer (main effect p-values corrected for multiple testing at the within-gene level < 0.04). These loci drove the association between the non-homologous end-joining pathway, and PR- breast cancer (AML p-value for the full pathway = 0.002; p-value when the eight loci were removed = 0.86). A Kernel machine test of no linear or quadratic effects, or pairwise interaction, yielded a p-value of 0.85. Common variation alone in DNA repair genes plays at most a small role in determining postmenopausal breast cancer risk among women of European ancestry.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePostmenopauseBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesDNA RepairFemaleGene FrequencyGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansLikelihood FunctionsLogistic ModelsOdds RatioProspective StudiesReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesterone

Identifiers

PMID20496165
PMCPMC2997162
OpenAlexW1985696120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.