ReviewSurgery today2010
The role of surgery in the treatment of neuroblastoma.
Review in Surgery today, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical value ofQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Clinical characteristics and prognoses in pediatric neuroblastoma with bone or liver metastasis: data from the SEER 2010-2019.BMC pediatrics · 2024Article
- Role of image-defined risk factors in predicting surgical complications of localized neuroblastoma.Pediatric surgery international · 2020Article
- Advances in the Surgical Treatment of Neuroblastoma.Chinese medical journal · 2018Review
- Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy in the diagnosis of neuroblastic tumors in children: a retrospective study on 83 cases.Pediatric surgery international · 2017Article
- Is complete surgical resection of stage 4 neuroblastoma a prerequisite for optimal survival or may >95 % tumour resection suffice?Pediatric surgery international · 2012Review
- Implications of surgical intervention in the treatment of neuroblastomas: 20-year experience of a single institution.Surgery today · 2012Article
- DO THE RADIOLOGICAL CRITERIA WITH THE USE OF RISK FACTORS IMPACT THE FORECASTING OF ABDOMINAL NEUROBLASTIC TUMOR RESECTION IN CHILDREN?Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The role of surgery varies greatly according to the clinical condition of the patients with neuroblastoma. A surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment for a localized tumor. However, in the era of intense chemotherapy associated with hematopoietic stem cell plant rescue, surgical resections are recommended without sacrificing the kidney or major vessels. Tumor biology further defines the necessity of supportive chemotherapy or radiation after surgical resection. The presence of diverse terminology concerning the range of resection may impose some confusion in the understanding of the previous papers. Therefore, the definition of a surgical resection was initially stated. In high-risk patients, the advantages of surgery for a patient's survival seem to be limited. This article reviews the efficacy of surgical resections in different clinical situations for a better understanding of the meaning of surgery in the treatment of neuroblastoma. The results of surgical resections are summarized according to the International Neuroblastoma Staging System. Finally, the long-term results regarding the strategy-related survival of the patients in the Niigata tumor board are briefly introduced.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20496133What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.