Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20495780›Full record

ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2011

Association of treatment satisfaction and psychopathological sub-syndromes among involuntary patients with psychotic disorders.

Michelle Richardson, Christina Katsakou, Stefan Priebe

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michelle RichardsonUnit for Social and Community Psychiatry, Barts and the London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK. m.richardson@qmul.ac.uk
Christina Katsakou
Stefan Priebe
Queen Mary University of London · GB

Funding

Department of Health 0230072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePrevious research has shown a link between treatment satisfaction and global psychopathology in different groups of psychiatric patients. However, neither the relationship between treatment satisfaction and the sub-syndromes of global psychopathology nor their temporal ordering have been explored.

methodsParticipants admitted involuntarily to psychiatric wards in the UK and diagnosed with psychotic disorders (N = 232) were included. Treatment satisfaction and psychopathological sub-syndromes (i.e., manic excitement, anxiety-depression, negative symptoms, positive symptoms) were measured within 1 week and at 1 month after admission.

resultsRepeated measures ANOVAs showed that higher treatment satisfaction is associated with lower scores on the manic excitement, anxiety-depression and positive symptom sub-syndromes, while no significant association was found for negative symptoms. However, cross-lagged panel analyses showed that treatment satisfaction predicted change only in positive symptoms while none of the paths from the relevant sub-syndromes to treatment satisfaction was significant.

conclusionTreatment satisfaction can be regarded as an antecedent of changes in positive symptoms only. These results underline the importance of examining psychopathological sub-syndromes separately as they may relate differentially to other important correlates of psychoses.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionAdultBrief Psychiatric Rating ScaleCommitment of Persons with Psychiatric DisordersFemaleHospitals, PsychiatricHumansInpatientsMaleMiddle AgedPsychopathologyPsychotic DisordersSyndromeUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID20495780
OpenAlexW2156949731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.