Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20495088›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN2010

Extending comprehensive cancer center expertise in clinical cancer genetics and genomics to diverse communities: the power of partnership.

Deborah J MacDonald, Kathleen R Blazer, Jeffrey N Weitzel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Examination of the Patient-Focused Impact of Cancer Telegenetics Among a Rural Population: Comparison with Traditional In-Person Services.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Appreciating the broad clinical features of SMAD4 mutation carriers: a multicenter chart review.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Deborah J MacDonaldDivision of Clinical Cancer Genetics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California 91010, USA.
Kathleen R Blazer
Jeffrey N Weitzel

Funding

ZOPOLRESTAT IN NORMOTENSIVE, TYPE 1 DIA WITH INCIPIENT NEPHROPATHYM01RR000043 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI ZAIA, JOHN A · 1985 to 2010
$76.4M
CLINICAL CANCER GENETICS FELLOWSHIP PROGRAMR25CA085771 · NCI · CITY OF HOPE/BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI WEITZEL, JEFFREY N · 2001 to 2010
$3.8M
Community Cancer Genetics and Research Training (Revision)R25CA112486 · NCI · CITY OF HOPE/BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI WEITZEL, JEFFREY N · 2005 to 2009
$1.0M
CLINICAL CANCER GENETICS EDUCATIONR25CA075131 · NCI · CITY OF HOPE NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER · PI WEITZEL, JEFFREY N · 1997 to 2005
$848k
NCI NIH HHS 2R25 CA75131NCI NIH HHS R25 CA075131NCI NIH HHS R25 CA085771NCI NIH HHS R25 CA112486NCI NIH HHS R25 CA85771NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000043NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR00043PHS HHS MCHG-51
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapidly evolving genetic and genomic technologies for genetic cancer risk assessment (GCRA) are revolutionizing the approach to targeted therapy and cancer screening and prevention, heralding the era of personalized medicine. Although many academic medical centers provide GCRA services, most people receive their medical care in the community setting. However, few community clinicians have the knowledge or time needed to adequately select, apply, and interpret genetic/genomic tests. This article describes alternative approaches to the delivery of GCRA services, profiling the City of Hope Cancer Screening & Prevention Program Network (CSPPN) academic and community-based health center partnership as a model for the delivery of the highest-quality evidence-based GCRA services while promoting research participation in the community setting. Growth of the CSPPN was enabled by information technology, with videoconferencing for telemedicine and Web conferencing for remote participation in interdisciplinary genetics tumor boards. Grant support facilitated the establishment of an underserved minority outreach clinic in the regional County hospital. Innovative clinician education, technology, and collaboration are powerful tools to extend GCRA expertise from a National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center, enabling diffusion of evidenced-base genetic/genomic information and best practice into the community setting.

Indexed as

Cultural DiversityGenetic CounselingGenomicsPrecision MedicineAcademic Medical CentersCaliforniaClinical CompetenceCommunity Health CentersCommunity-Institutional RelationsHealth EducationHumansMedically Underserved AreaMinority GroupsNeoplasmsOncology Service, HospitalPatient Education as Topic

Identifiers

PMID20495088
PMCPMC3299537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.