Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20494938›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2010

The importance of being cis: evolution of orthologous fish and mammalian enhancer activity.

Deborah I Ritter, Qiang Li, Dennis Kostka, Katherine S Pollard, Su Guo, Jeffrey H Chuang

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Cis-regulatory control of mammalian Trps1 gene expression.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The mystery of extreme non-coding conservation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Deborah I RitterDepartment of Biology, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, USA.
Qiang Li
Dennis Kostka
Katherine S Pollard
Su Guo
Jeffrey H Chuang
Boston College · USGladstone Institutes · US

Funding

Development of Dopaminergic Neurons in ZebrafishR01NS042626 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GUO, SU · 2003 to 2012
$3.4M
What Made Us Human?R01GM082901 · NIGMS · J. DAVID GLADSTONE INSTITUTES · PI POLLARD, KATHERINE S. · 2008 to 2011
$1.4M
Role of conserved non-coding elements in vertebrate brain developmentR21HD051835 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GUO, SU · 2006 to 2007
$346k
NICHD NIH HHS HD051835NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD051835NIGMS NIH HHS GM82901NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM082901NINDS NIH HHS NS042626NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS042626
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conserved noncoding elements (CNEs) in vertebrate genomes often act as developmental enhancers, but a critical issue is how well orthologous CNE sequences retain the same activity in their respective species, a characteristic important for generalization of model organism studies. To quantify how well CNE enhancer activity has been preserved, we compared the anatomy-specific activities of 41 zebra fish CNEs in zebra fish embryos with the activities of orthologous human CNEs in mouse embryos. We found that 13/41 (∼30%) of the orthologous CNE pairs exhibit conserved positive activity in zebra fish and mouse. Conserved positive activity is only weakly associated with either sequence conservation or the absence of bases undergoing accelerated evolution. A stronger effect is that disparate activity is associated with transcription factor binding site divergence. To distinguish the contributions of cis- versus trans-regulatory changes, we analyzed 13 CNEs in a three-way experimental comparison: human CNE tested in zebra fish, human CNE tested in mouse, and orthologous zebra fish CNE tested in zebra fish. Both cis- and trans-changes affect a significant fraction of CNEs, although human and zebra fish sequences exhibit disparate activity in zebra fish (indicating cis regulatory changes) twice as often as human sequences show disparate activity when tested in mouse and zebra fish (indicating trans regulatory changes). In all four cases where the zebra fish and human CNE display a similar expression pattern in zebra fish, the human CNE also displays a similar expression pattern in mouse. This suggests that the endogenous enhancer activity of ∼30% of human CNEs can be determined from experiments in zebra fish alone, and to identify these CNEs, both the zebra fish and the human sequences should be tested.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAnimalsConserved SequenceDNA, IntergenicEnhancer Elements, GeneticGene Expression ProfilingGene Regulatory NetworksHumansMiceROC CurveTranscription FactorsZebrafishDNA, IntergenicTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID20494938
PMCPMC3107594
OpenAlexW2062819328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.