Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20493828›Full record

ArticleBrain research2010

MEG in the macaque monkey and human: distinguishing cortical fields in space and time.

Johanna M Zumer, Srikantan S Nagarajan, Leah A Krubitzer, Zhao Zhu, Robert S Turner, Elizabeth A Disbrow

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Brain research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Johanna M ZumerDepartment of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Srikantan S Nagarajan
Leah A Krubitzer
Zhao Zhu
Robert S Turner
Elizabeth A Disbrow
University of California, San Francisco · USNeurological Surgery · USUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX &THALAMUSR01NS035103 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI KRUBITZER, LEAH ANN · 1997 to 2014
$4.6M
Cortical spatiotemporal plasticity in humansR01DC004855 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI NAGARAJAN, SRIKANTAN S. · 2002 to 2011
$2.9M
Linking Functional Imaging, Neurophysiology &AnatomyR01NS044590 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI DISBROW, ELIZABETH A · 2003 to 2007
$2.4M
Neural mechanisms of auditory feedback during speechR01DC006435 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI NAGARAJAN, SRIKANTAN S. · 2004 to 2008
$2.3M
MOTOR SEQUENCES AND FRONTAL/BASAL GANGLIA MOTOR CIRCUITSR01NS039146 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO · PI TURNER, ROBERT STERLING · 1999 to 2002
$357k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004855NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006435NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC4855NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC6435NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS035103NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS039146NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS044590NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS35103NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS44590
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is an increasingly popular non-invasive tool used to record, on a millisecond timescale, the magnetic field changes generated by cortical neural activity. MEG has the advantage, over fMRI for example, that it is a direct measure of neural activity. In the current investigation we used MEG to measure cortical responses to tactile and auditory stimuli in the macaque monkey. We had two aims. First, we sought to determine whether MEG, a technique that may have low spatial accuracy, could be used to distinguish the location and organization of sensory cortical fields in macaque monkeys, a species with a relatively small brain compared to that of the human. Second, we wanted to examine the temporal dynamics of cortical responses in the macaque monkey relative to the human. We recorded MEG data from anesthetized monkeys and, for comparison, from awake humans that were presented with simple tactile and auditory stimuli. Neural source reconstruction of MEG data showed that primary somatosensory and auditory cortex could be differentiated and, further, that separate representations of the digit and lip within somatosensory cortex could be identified in macaque monkeys as well as humans. We compared the latencies of activity from monkey and human data for the three stimulation types and proposed a correspondence between the neural responses of the two species. We thus demonstrate the feasibility of using MEG in the macaque monkey and provide a non-human primate model for examining the relationship between external evoked magnetic fields and their underlying neural sources.

Indexed as

AdultAnesthesiaAnimalsAuditory CortexAuditory PerceptionBrain MappingEvoked Potentials, AuditoryEvoked Potentials, SomatosensoryFeasibility StudiesFemaleFingersHumansLipMacacaMagnetoencephalographyMale

Identifiers

PMID20493828
PMCPMC2899153
OpenAlexW2087392607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.