Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20493706›Full record

ReviewTrends in cell biology2010

Polarity and endocytosis: reciprocal regulation.

Jessica M Shivas, Holly A Morrison, David Bilder, Ahna R Skop

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in cell biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Morphology and molecular phylogeny ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Autophagy and Tumorigenesis in Drosophila.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2019
    Review
  13. Modeling Tissue Polarity in Context.Journal of molecular biology · 2018
    Review
  14. Papillomaviruses and Endocytic Trafficking.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jessica M ShivasLaboratory of Genetics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Holly A Morrison
David Bilder
Ahna R Skop

Funding

Regulation of Drosophila Epithelial PolarityR01GM068675 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI BILDER, DAVID · 2003 to 2017
$3.9M
Investigating plasma membrane regulation during embryonic developmentK01HL092583 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SKOP, AHNA RENEE · 2008 to 2012
$668k
NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL092583NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM068675
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The establishment and maintenance of polarized plasma membrane domains is essential for cellular function and proper development of organisms. The molecules and pathways involved in determining cell polarity are remarkably well conserved between animal species. Historically, exocytic mechanisms have received primary emphasis among trafficking routes responsible for cell polarization. Accumulating evidence now reveals that endocytosis plays an equally important role in the proper localization of key polarity proteins. Intriguingly, some polarity proteins can also regulate the endocytic machinery. Here, we review emerging evidence for the reciprocal regulation between polarity proteins and endocytic pathways, and discuss possible models for how these distinct processes could interact to create separate cellular domains.

Indexed as

Cell PolarityEndocytosisAnimalsCell MembraneEmbryo, NonmammalianEpithelial CellsMembrane ProteinsOocytesMembrane Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20493706
PMCPMC2917511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.