Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20492012›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2010

Evolving practice of the Helsinki Skin Bank.

Andrew J Lindford, Ira Frey, Jyrki Vuola, Virve Koljonen

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. 26 Years of Skin Banking in Finland.European burn journal · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrew J LindfordDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. andrew.lindford@hus.fi
Ira Frey
Jyrki Vuola
Virve Koljonen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to review the management and running of the Helsinki Skin Bank between the years 2001 and 2008. Further aims were to assess the microbiological safety of the glycerol-preserved allograft skin and analyse its clinical use. The files of the Helsinki Skin Bank were reviewed for allograft skin harvested from organ donors between 2001 and 2008. Data on harvested skin area and microbiological culture results were collected. The patients receiving allograft were also identified and operation indications analysed. Allograft skin was collected from 115 donors, with a mean of 44,335 cm(2) per year. No skin batches were discarded. Microbiological cultures of the allograft skin batches were negative in 86 (75%) cases. Thirty-five donor skin batches were used in 69 operations. The most common indication was 'Biological dressing on partial-thickness burns', comprising 52% of cases. The cost per cm(2) was 0.81euro. The use of allograft skin in the Helsinki Skin Bank is microbiologically safe and continues to provide a versatile and useful treatment modality in many major burn cases with few observed complications. As compared with synthetically produced temporary dressings currently available, our allograft skin is also more economical.

Indexed as

SkinAdultBiological DressingsBurnsFacility Regulation and ControlFinlandGlycerolHumansInfection ControlMiddle AgedOrgan Preservation SolutionsPatient SelectionProgram EvaluationSafetySkin TransplantationTissue and Organ HarvestingGlycerolOrgan Preservation Solutions

Identifiers

PMID20492012
PMCPMC7951557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.