Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20491723›Full record

Trial reportAddiction (Abingdon, England)2010

Matching motivation enhancement treatment to client motivation: re-examining the Project MATCH motivation matching hypothesis.

Katie Witkiewitz, Bryan Hartzler, Dennis Donovan

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Motivational interviewing for substance use reduction.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Dismantling motivational interviewing: Effects on initiation of behavior change among problem drinkers seeking treatment.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2017
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Profiles of confidence and commitment to change as predictors of moderated drinking: a person-centered approach.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2014
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Sex and Gender Effects in Recovery From Alcohol Use Disorder.Alcohol research : current reviews · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Relapse prevention for addictive behaviors.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2011
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katie WitkiewitzAlcohol and Drug Abuse Institute, University of Washington, 1107 NE 45th Street, Seattle,WA 98105-4631, USA. kate19@u.washington.edu
Bryan Hartzler
Dennis Donovan
University of Washington · US

Funding

Modeling Individual Heterogeneity in the Alcohol Relapse ProcessR03AA016322 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WITKIEWITZ, KATIE · 2006 to 2007
$135k
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA016322-01NIAAA NIH HHS R03 AA016322
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe current study was designed to re-examine the motivation matching hypothesis from Project MATCH using growth mixture modeling, an analytical technique that models variation in individual drinking patterns. DESIGN, SETTING AND

participantsSecondary data analyses of data from Project MATCH (n = 1726), a large multi-site alcoholism treatment-matching study. MEASUREMENTS: Percentage of drinking days was the primary outcome measure, assessed from 1 month to 12 months following treatment. Treatment assignment, alcohol dependence symptoms and baseline percentage of drinking days were included as covariates.

findingsThe results provided support for the motivation matching hypothesis in the out-patient sample and among females in the aftercare sample: the majority of individuals with lower baseline motivation had better outcomes if assigned to motivation enhancement treatment (MET) compared to those assigned to cognitive behavioral treatment (CBT). In the aftercare sample there was a moderating effect of gender and alcohol dependence severity, whereby males with lower baseline motivation and greater alcohol dependence drank more frequently if assigned to MET compared to those assigned to CBT.

conclusionsResults from the current study lend partial support to the motivation-matching hypothesis and also demonstrated the importance of moderating influences on treatment matching effectiveness. Based upon these findings, individuals with low baseline motivation in out-patient settings and males with low levels of alcohol dependence or females in aftercare settings may benefit more from motivational enhancement techniques than from cognitive-behavioral techniques.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalMotivationPatient SelectionAftercareAlcohol DrinkingAlcoholismAmbulatory CareAttitude to HealthCognitive Behavioral TherapyData Interpretation, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareSeverity of Illness IndexSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID20491723
PMCPMC3157315
OpenAlexW1912893695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.