ReviewMycopathologia2010
Candida dubliniensis: epidemiology and phenotypic methods for identification.
Review in Mycopathologia, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antifungal and Antivirulence Activity of Alizarin againstACS infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Gut Mycobiota Dysbiosis in People Living with HIV/AIDS: Insights from an Argentine Cohort with Severe Immunosuppression.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Exploring the Biology, Virulence, and General Aspects ofInfection and drug resistance · 2024Review
- Activity ofNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Factors influencing the presence of Candida dubliniensis and other non-albicans species in patients with oral lichen planus: a retrospective observational study.Clinical oral investigations · 2022Observational
- Comparison of PCR-RFLP with 21-plex PCR and rDNA Sequencing for Identification of Clinical Yeast Isolates.Mycopathologia · 2021Article
- Epidemiology of fungal diseases in Africa: A review of diagnostic drivers.Current medical mycology · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
- Methods of Candida dubliniensis identification and its occurrence in human clinical material.Folia microbiologica · 2017Article
- Article
- Discrimination of Candida albicans from Candida dubliniensis by Use of the BioFire FilmArray Blood Culture Identification Panel.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2015Article
- Third case of Candida dubliniensis endogenous endophthalmitis in North America: case report and review of the literature.International ophthalmology · 2014Review
- The usefulness of DNA sequencing after extraction by Whatman FTA filter matrix technology and phenotypic tests for differentiation of Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis.Mycopathologia · 2014Article
- Oral candidosis in lichen planus: the diagnostic approach is of major therapeutic importance.Clinical oral investigations · 2013Article
- Pseudomembranous candidiasis in HIV/AIDS patients in Cali, Colombia.Mycopathologia · 2013Article
- Candida dubliniensis endophthalmitis: first case in North America.International ophthalmology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Candida dubliniensis is an emerging pathogen first described in 1995, which shares many phenotypic features with Candida albicans and therefore may be misidentified in microbial laboratories. Despite various phenotypic techniques described in the literature to differentiate the two species, the correct identification of C. dubliniensis remains problematic due to phenotypic similarities between these species. Thus, as the differences between both are best characterized at genetic levels, several molecular methods have been proposed to provide a specific and rapid identification of this species. Epidemiological studies have shown that C. dubliniensis is prevalent throughout the world and it is primarily associated with oral carriage and oropharyngeal infections in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). However, data acquired from its isolation from other healthy and immunocompromised patients are variable, and there is still no real consensus on the epidemiological relevance of this species. In this article, we review the various phenotypic methods used in the identification of C. dubliniensis and the epidemiological impact of this new species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20490751What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.