Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20490569›Full record

ArticleSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2010

[Validation of the German version of the Regional Pain Scale for the diagnosis of fibromyalgia syndrome].

W Häuser, S Schild, M Kosseva, S Hayo, H von Wilmowski, R Alten, J Langhorst, W Hofmann, J Maus, H Glaesmer

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Measuring PROMIS pain interference in German patients with chronic conditions: calibration, validation, and cross-cultural use of item parameters.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

W HäuserKlinik für Innere Medizin I, Klinikum Saarbrücken GmbH, Saarbrücken, Deutschland. whaeuser@klinikum-saarbruecken.de
S Schild
M Kosseva
S Hayo
H von Wilmowski
R Alten
J Langhorst
W Hofmann
J Maus
H Glaesmer
Klinikum Saarbrücken · DEKliniken Essen-Mitte · DELeipzig University · DESchlosspark-Klinik · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveUse of the American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for the clinical diagnosis of fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is under debate. The Regional Pain Scale (RPS) had been developed for the diagnosis of FMS in clinical practice and in survey settings (survey criteria of FMS). So far a German version has not been validated.

methodsA total of 216 patients with FMS, 53 with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and 60 with depressive disorder, recruited from clinical institutions completed the RPS. Forty-three patients with FMS filled in the RPS within 8 weeks a second time.

resultsThe intraclass coefficient of FMS diagnosis after 8 weeks was 0.78 (test-retest reliability). The 7-day interval of pain was criticized by physicians. The absence of some articular pain regions was criticized by patients (face validity). The concordance of FMS diagnoses to survey and ACR criteria was 84.7% (+/-1.1); 45.3% of the patients with RA and 38.3% of the patients with depressive disorder met the survey criteria of FMS (discriminant validity).

conclusionThe RPS has good reliability and convergent validity, but limited discriminant validity. The RPS is suited as a screening instrument for the diagnosis of FMS in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonAdolescentAdultAgedArthritis, RheumatoidCross-Sectional StudiesDepressive DisorderFemaleFibromyalgiaGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPsychometricsReference Values

Identifiers

PMID20490569
OpenAlexW1572914165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.