Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20490488›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2010

18F-FDG PET/CT in the characterization and surgical decision concerning adrenal masses: a prospective multicentre evaluation.

Catherine Ansquer, Sonia Scigliano, Eric Mirallié, David Taïeb, Laurent Brunaud, Fredéric Sebag, Christophe Leux, Delphine Drui, Benoît Dupas, Karine Renaudin and 1 more

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Diagnostic accuracy ofThe British journal of radiology · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Alterations inMolecular imaging and radionuclide therapy · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Role ofReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. 18F-FDG-PET/CT Evaluation of Indeterminate Adrenal Masses in Noncancer Patients.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2021
    Article
  12. May an adrenal incidentaloma change its nature?Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. FDG PET/CT in the Staging of Lung Cancer.Current radiopharmaceuticals · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Targeting PSMA by radioligands in non-prostate disease-current status and future perspectives.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2018
    Review
  18. Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Adrenal Incidentaloma.Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) · 2017
    Review
  19. Review
  20. What parameters from 18F-FDG PET/CT are useful in evaluation of adrenal lesions?European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Catherine AnsquerService de Médecine Nucléaire, CHU-Hôtel Dieu, Nantes, France. catherine.ansquer@chu-nantes.fr
Sonia Scigliano
Eric Mirallié
David Taïeb
Laurent Brunaud
Fredéric Sebag
Christophe Leux
Delphine Drui
Benoît Dupas
Karine Renaudin
Françoise Kraeber-Bodéré
Hôtel-Dieu de Paris · FRCentre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy · FRHôpital de la Timone · FRCentre d'Investigation Clinique de Nantes · FRCentre Hospitalier René-Dubos · FRHôpital Laennec · FRHôpital Saint-Jacques · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis prospective multicentre study assesses the usefulness of FDG PET/CT in characterizing and making the therapeutic decision concerning adrenal tumours that are suspicious or indeterminate in nature after conventional examinations (CE).

methodsSeventy-eight patients (37 men, 41 women, 81 adrenal lesions) underwent FDG PET/CT after CE including CT scan, biological tests and optionally (131)I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) and/or (131)I-norcholesterol scans. FDG adrenal uptake exceeding that of the liver was considered positive. PET results were not decisive. Surgery was discussed when at least one of the following criteria was found during CE: size >3 cm, spontaneous attenuation value >10 HU, heterogeneous aspect, abnormal MIBG or norcholesterol scan or hormonal hypersecretion.

resultsFollowing the gold standard (histology analysis or >or=9 months follow-up), 49 lesions potentially qualified for surgery (malignant = 27, benign secreting = 22) and 32 benign non-secreting lesions did not. PET was negative in 97% of non-surgical lesions and positive in 73% of potentially surgical ones which included all the malignant lesions, except 3 renal cell metastases, and 12 of 22 benign secreting lesions. The negative predictive value for malignancy was 93% (41/44) and positive predictive value for detecting surgical lesions was 97% (36/37). A high FDG uptake (maximum standardized uptake value >or= 10) was highly predictive of malignancy.

conclusionAdrenal FDG uptake is a good indicator of malignancy and/or of secreting lesions and should lead one to discuss surgery. If there is no prior history of poorly FDG-avid cancer, the absence of FDG uptake should avoid unnecessary removal of benign adrenal lesions.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Adrenal Gland NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPositron-Emission TomographyProspective StudiesRecurrenceTomography, X-Ray ComputedYoung AdultFluorodeoxyglucose F18

Identifiers

PMID20490488
OpenAlexW2023041478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.