Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20490456›Full record

ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2011

Health of national service veterans: an analysis of a community-based sample using data from the 2007 Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey of England.

Charlotte Woodhead, Roberto J Rona, Amy C Iversen, Deirdre MacManus, Matthew Hotopf, Kimberlie Dean, Sally McManus, Howard Meltzer, Traolach Brugha, Rachel Jenkins and 2 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. The mental health of the UK Armed Forces: where facts meet fiction.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2014
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Mental health of Special Forces personnel deployed in battle.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Charlotte WoodheadAcademic Centre for Defence Mental Health, Weston Education Centre, King's College London, Cutcombe Rd, London SE5 9RJ, UK.
Roberto J Rona
Amy C Iversen
Deirdre MacManus
Matthew Hotopf
Kimberlie Dean
Sally McManus
Howard Meltzer
Traolach Brugha
Rachel Jenkins
Simon Wessely
Nicola T Fear

Funding

Medical Research Council G0901999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn the context of increasing concerns for the health of UK armed forces veterans, this study aims to compare the prevalence of current mental, physical and behavioural difficulties in conscripted national service veterans with population controls, and to assess the impact of length of service in the military. The compulsory nature of national service sets these veterans apart from younger veterans.

methodData are drawn from a nationally representative community-dwelling sample of England. We compared 484 male national service veterans to 301 male non-veterans aged 65+ years.

resultsThere were no differences in mental, behavioural or physical outcomes, except that veterans were less likely to have "any mental disorder" than non-veterans (age adjusted OR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.31, 0.99). Longer serving veterans were older but were not different in terms of mental, behavioural or physical outcomes.

conclusionsCommunity-dwelling national service veterans are at no greater risk of current adverse mental, physical or behavioural health than population controls.

Indexed as

AgedEnglandHealth StatusHealth SurveysHumansMaleMental DisordersPrevalenceRisk FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsTime FactorsVeterans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.