Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20489716›Full record

ArticleNature chemistry2010

Geometry-controlled kinetics.

O Bénichou, C Chevalier, J Klafter, B Meyer, R Voituriez

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature chemistry, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Control of encounter kinetics by chemically active droplets.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Diffusion-Controlled Reactions: An Overview.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Diffusive search and trajectories on tubular networks: a propagator approach.The European physical journal. E, Soft matter · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Target competition for resources under multiple search-and-capture events with stochastic resetting.Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

O BénichouUPMC Univ Paris 06, CNRS-UMR 7600 Laboratoire de Physique Théorique de la Matière Condensée, 4 Place Jussieu, F-75005 Paris, France. benichou@lptmc.jussieu.fr
C Chevalier
J Klafter
B Meyer
R Voituriez

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has long been appreciated that the transport properties of molecules can control reaction kinetics. This effect can be characterized by the time it takes a diffusing molecule to reach a target-the first-passage time (FPT). Determining the FPT distribution in realistic confined geometries has until now, however, seemed intractable. Here, we calculate this FPT distribution analytically and show that transport processes as varied as regular diffusion, anomalous diffusion, and diffusion in disordered media and fractals, fall into the same universality classes. Beyond the theoretical aspect, this result changes our views on standard reaction kinetics and we introduce the concept of 'geometry-controlled kinetics'. More precisely, we argue that geometry-and in particular the initial distance between reactants in 'compact' systems-can become a key parameter. These findings could help explain the crucial role that the spatial organization of genes has in transcription kinetics, and more generally the impact of geometry on diffusion-limited reactions.

Indexed as

Cell NucleusTranscription, GeneticAnimalsCatalysisHumansKineticsTranscription FactorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID20489716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.