Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20488836›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental botany2010

Natural variation in herbivore-induced volatiles in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Tjeerd A L Snoeren, Iris F Kappers, Colette Broekgaarden, Roland Mumm, Marcel Dicke, Harro J Bouwmeester

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Variation in Leaf Volatile Emissions in Potato (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tjeerd A L SnoerenLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University, EH Wageningen, The Netherlands. tjeerd.snoeren@wur.nl
Iris F Kappers
Colette Broekgaarden
Roland Mumm
Marcel Dicke
Harro J Bouwmeester

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To study whether natural variation in Arabidopsis thaliana could be used to dissect the genetic basis of responses to herbivory in terms of induced volatile emissions, nine accessions were characterized upon herbivory by biting-chewing Pieris rapae caterpillars or after treatment with the phytohormone jasmonic acid (JA). Analysis of 73 compounds in the headspace showed quantitative differences in the emission rates of several individual compounds among the accessions. Moreover, variation in the emission of volatile compounds after JA treatment was reflected in the behaviour of the parasitoid Diadegma semiclausum when they were offered the headspace volatiles of several combinations of accessions in two-choice experiments. Accessions also differ in transcript levels of genes that are associated with the emission of plant volatiles. The genes BSMT1 and Cyp72A13 could be connected to the emission of methyl salicylate and (E,E)-4,8,12-trimethyltrideca-1,3,7,11-tetraene (TMTT), respectively. Overall, Arabidopsis showed interesting phenotypic variations with respect to the volatile blend emitted in response to herbivory that can be exploited to identify genes and alleles that underlie this important plant trait.

Indexed as

AnimalsArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsButterfliesCyclopentanesFeeding BehaviorGene Expression Regulation, PlantHost-Parasite InteractionsOxylipinsVolatile Organic CompoundsWaspsArabidopsis ProteinsCyclopentanesjasmonic acidOxylipinsVolatile Organic Compounds

Identifiers

PMID20488836
PMCPMC2892144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.