ReviewThe Canadian journal of cardiology2010
The 2010 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management of hypertension: part I - blood pressure measurement, diagnosis and assessment of risk.
Review in The Canadian journal of cardiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Step Monitoring to improve ARTERial health (SMARTER) through step count prescription in type 2 diabetes and hypertension: trial design and methods.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2014Trial
- Management of hypertensive urgencies: a new opportunity for unattended blood pressure measurement.Journal of human hypertension · 2024Article
- Differences in Antihypertensive Medication Prescription Profiles Between 2009 and 2021: A Retrospective Cohort Study of CARTaGENE.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2024Article
- Implementation of home blood pressure monitoring among French GPs: A long and winding road.PloS one · 2019Article
- 24-hour aortic blood pressure variability showed a stronger association with carotid damage than 24-hour brachial blood pressure variability: The SAFAR study.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2018Article
- Pay-for-performance remuneration for pharmacist prescribers' management of hypertension: A substudy of the RxACTION trial.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC · 2016Article
- Nonadherence to Recommended Guidelines for Blood Pressure Measurement.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2016Article
- Article
- Theoretical and practical knowledge of nursing professionals on indirect blood pressure measurement at a coronary care unit.Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2014Article
- Automated office blood pressure measurement in primary care.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2014Review
- Hypertension management initiative prospective cohort study: comparison between immediate and delayed intervention groups.Journal of human hypertension · 2014Article
- The new hypertension guidelines.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2013Review
- Differences in blood pressure measurements obtained using an automatic oscillometric sphygmomanometer depending on clothes-wearing status.Korean journal of family medicine · 2013Article
- Blood pressure measurement: clinic, home, ambulatory, and beyond.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2012Review
- New recommendations for the use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the diagnosis of hypertension.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2012Article
- Economic analysis of Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario's Hypertension Management Initiative.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2012Article
- Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in hypertension: an evidence-based analysis.Ontario health technology assessment series · 2012Review
- Harmonization of guidelines for the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease: the C-CHANGE Initiative.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2011Article
- Why use automated office blood pressure measurements in clinical practice?High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
35 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo provide updated, evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and assessment of adults with hypertension. EVIDENCE: MEDLINE searches were conducted from November 2008 to October 2009 with the aid of a medical librarian. Reference lists were scanned, experts were contacted, and the personal files of authors and subgroup members were used to identify additional studies. Content and methodological experts assessed studies using prespecified, standardized evidence-based algorithms. Recommendations were based on evidence from peer-reviewed full-text articles only. RECOMMENDATIONS: Recommendations for blood pressure measurement, criteria for hypertension diagnosis and follow-up, assessment of global cardiovascular risk, diagnostic testing, diagnosis of renovascular and endocrine causes of hypertension, home and ambulatory monitoring, and the use of echocardiography in hypertensive individuals are outlined. Changes to the recommendations for 2010 relate to automated office blood pressure measurements. Automated office blood pressure measurements can be used in the assessment of office blood pressure. When used under proper conditions, an automated office systolic blood pressure of 135 mmHg or higher or diastolic blood pressure of 85 mmHg or higher should be considered analogous to a mean awake ambulatory systolic blood pressure of 135 mmHg or higher and diastolic blood pressure of 85 mmHg or higher, respectively. VALIDATION: All recommendations were graded according to strength of the evidence and voted on by the 63 members of the Canadian Hypertension Education Program Evidence-Based Recommendations Task Force. To be approved, all recommendations were required to be supported by at least 70% of task force members. These guidelines will continue to be updated annually.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.