ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2010
Effectiveness of epidural anesthesia for external cephalic version (ECV).
Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Height of elevated fetal buttock for prediction of successful external cephalic version.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2020Article
- Regional anesthesia for external cephalic version: its time has come.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe Cochrane review conducted in 2001 re-established the usefulness of external cephalic version (ECV). The success rate for ECV using epidural anesthesia or spinal anesthesia is reported to be 35 to 86%. In this study, we examined the effectiveness of epidural anesthesia for ECV. STUDY
designA retrospective cohort study was conducted of pregnant women who were at 35 to 36 weeks of gestation between 2001 and June 2009, with a single fetus, non-cephalic presentation and without non-reassuring fetal status. The subjects were ultrasonographically examined for placental location, presence/absence of nuchal cord and amniotic fluid volume. Those with placenta previa, early rupture of membranes, uterine anomaly or severe fetal anomaly and those in whom delivery was initiated were excluded from the study. The study protocol was approved by the institutional ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtained for all procedures described in the protocol. The success rate for ECV was compared between the anesthesia and non-anesthesia groups. Analysis was also performed to identify factors contributing to successful ECV.
resultThere were 86 women with non-cephalic presentation who underwent ECV during the study period. The non-anesthesia group consisted of 34 women in whom ritodrine hydrochloride, a tocolytic agent, was administered alone, and 52 women in whom a tocolytic agent and epidural anesthesia were used constituted the anesthesia group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, parity, body mass index and placental location. The success rate for ECV was 55.9% (19/34 patients) in the non-anesthesia group and 78.8% (41/52 patients) in the anesthesia group, showing a significant difference between the two groups (odds ratio 1.75, 95% confidence interval 1.26 to 2.44). Analysis was also performed to identify factors determining successful ECV other than epidural anesthesia from among age, parity, body mass index, placental location, presence/absence of uterine myoma, nuchal code and previous cesarean delivery; however, none of the factors identified was found to be a significant determinant factor.
conclusionThe use of epidural anesthesia significantly increases the success rate for ECV for breech presentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.