ArticleNucleic acids research2010
BioCatalogue: a universal catalogue of web services for the life sciences.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
71 citing papers in PubMed, 217 citations in OpenAlex.
- Playbook workflow builder: Interactive construction of bioinformatics workflows.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- SynBioTools: a one-stop facility for searching and selecting synthetic biology tools.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Developing and reusing bioinformatics data analysis pipelines using scientific workflow systems.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Review
- Expasy, the Swiss Bioinformatics Resource Portal, as designed by its users.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- Perspectives on automated composition of workflows in the life sciences.F1000Research · 2021Article
- UCSF ChimeraX: Structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2021Article
- Recognizing software names in biomedical literature using machine learning.Health informatics journal · 2020Article
- U-Index, a dataset and an impact metric for informatics tools and databases.Scientific data · 2018Article
- UCSF ChimeraX: Meeting modern challenges in visualization and analysis.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2018Article
- ReGaTE: Registration of Galaxy Tools in Elixir.GigaScience · 2017Article
- Biological Web Service Repositories Review.Molecular informatics · 2017Review
- Exploring Protein-Protein Interactions as Drug Targets for Anti-cancer Therapy with In Silico Workflows.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2017Article
- Using bio.tools to generate and annotate workbench tool descriptions.F1000Research · 2017Article
- From the evaluation of existing solutions to an all-inclusive package for biobanks.Health and technology · 2017Article
- BioVeL: a virtual laboratory for data analysis and modelling in biodiversity science and ecology.BMC ecology · 2016Article
- Tools and data services registry: a community effort to document bioinformatics resources.Nucleic acids research · 2016Article
- Text mining resources for the life sciences.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2016Review
- Semantic biomedical resource discovery: a Natural Language Processing framework.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2015Article
- Bridging the gap between climate models and impact studies: the FORESEE Database.Geoscience data journal · 2015Article
- BOWS (bioinformatics open web services) to centralize bioinformatics tools in web services.BMC research notes · 2015Article
11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The use of Web Services to enable programmatic access to on-line bioinformatics is becoming increasingly important in the Life Sciences. However, their number, distribution and the variable quality of their documentation can make their discovery and subsequent use difficult. A Web Services registry with information on available services will help to bring together service providers and their users. The BioCatalogue (http://www.biocatalogue.org/) provides a common interface for registering, browsing and annotating Web Services to the Life Science community. Services in the BioCatalogue can be described and searched in multiple ways based upon their technical types, bioinformatics categories, user tags, service providers or data inputs and outputs. They are also subject to constant monitoring, allowing the identification of service problems and changes and the filtering-out of unavailable or unreliable resources. The system is accessible via a human-readable 'Web 2.0'-style interface and a programmatic Web Service interface. The BioCatalogue follows a community approach in which all services can be registered, browsed and incrementally documented with annotations by any member of the scientific community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.