Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20483638›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2010

Assessment of resolution parameters for CID-based shotgun proteomic experiments on the LTQ-Orbitrap mass spectrometer.

Min-Sik Kim, Kumaran Kandasamy, Raghothama Chaerkady, Akhilesh Pandey

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Improving proteome coverage on a LTQ-Orbitrap using design of experiments.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2011
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Min-Sik KimMcKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA.
Kumaran Kandasamy
Raghothama Chaerkady
Akhilesh Pandey
Institute of Bioinformatics · INJohns Hopkins Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

TCP5: ACTIVE SITE LABELING REAGENT FOR ACETYLTRANSFERASESU54RR020839 · NCRR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BOEKE, JEF D · 2004 to 2011
$27.4M
Purchase of a Linear Ion Trap/Fourier Transform Mass SpectrometerS10RR023025 · NCRR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI COTTER, ROBERT JAMES · 2007 to 2007
$928k
NHLBI PROTEOMICS INITIATIVE-N01HV28180-268028180-268028180N01HV028180 · HV · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI VAN EYK, JENNIFER E · 2002 to 2006
–
NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR023025NCRR NIH HHS S10RR023025NCRR NIH HHS U54 RR020839NCRR NIH HHS U54RR020839NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HV028180NHLBI NIH HHS N01-HV-28,180
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shotgun proteomics has been used extensively for characterization of a number of proteomes. High-resolution Fourier transform mass spectrometry (FTMS) has emerged as a powerful tool owing to its high mass accuracy and resolving power. One of its major limitations, however, is that the confidence level of peptide identification and sensitivity cannot be maximized simultaneously. Although it is generally assumed that higher resolution is better for peptide identifications, the precise effect of varying resolution as a parameter on peptide identification has not yet been systematically evaluated. We used the Escherichia coli proteome and a standard 48 protein mix to study the effect of different resolution parameters on peptide identifications in the setting of a shotgun proteomics experiment on an LTQ-Orbitrap mass spectrometer. We observed a higher number of peptide-spectrum matches (PSMs) whenever the MS scan was carried out by FT and the MS/MS in the ion-trap (IT) with the maximum PSMs obtained at an MS resolution of 30,000. In contrast, when samples were analyzed by FT for both MS and MS/MS, the number of PSMs was significantly lower (approximately 40% compared with FT-IT experiments) with the maximum PSMs obtained when both the MS and MS/MS resolution were set to 15,000. Thus, a 15K-15K resolution setting may provide the best compromise for studies where both speed and accuracy such as high-throughput post-translational analysis and de novo sequencing are important. We hope that our study will allow researchers to choose between different resolution parameters to achieve their desired results from proteomic analyses.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsEscherichia coliHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysPeptide MappingProteomicsReproducibility of ResultsSpectroscopy, Fourier Transform InfraredTandem Mass SpectrometryTime FactorsBacterial Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20483638
PMCPMC3030983
OpenAlexW1969949619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.