Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20483517›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2010

Racial differences in stage at diagnosis and survival from epithelial ovarian cancer: a fundamental cause of disease approach.

Seijeoung Kim, Therese A Dolecek, Faith G Davis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Timing of depression in relation to risk of ovarian cancer.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Associations of Healthcare Affordability, Availability, and Accessibility with Quality Treatment Metrics in Patients with Ovarian Cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Seijeoung KimUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, School of Public Health, Division of Health Policy and Administration, Chicago, IL 60612, United States. Electronic address: skim49@uic.edu.
Therese A DolecekUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, School of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Chicago, IL 60612, United States.
Faith G DavisUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, School of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Chicago, IL 60612, United States.

Funding

Systemic and dietary advanced glycation end products in type 2 diabetes-related cognitive decline and incident dementia: effects on Alzheimer's pathology and cerebrovascular diseaseR01AG061093 · NIA · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SCHNAIDER BEERI, MICHAL · 2019 to 2024
$4.3M
Incarceration Effects on Prevention of Drug Use, STI-HIV and RecidivismR00DA024012 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI KIM, SAGE J. · 2009 to 2011
$734k
EPIDEMIOLOGY OF EPITHELIAL OVARIAN CANCERR01CA061093 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI ROSENBLATT, KARIN A · 1993 to 1997
–
NCI NIH HHS R01CA61093-01NIA NIH HHS R01 AG061093NIDA NIH HHS R00 DA024012NIDA NIH HHS R00-DA024012-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Associations between race, socioeconomic status (SES) and health outcomes have been well established. One of the ways in which race and SES affect health is by influencing one's access to resources, which confers ability to avoid or mitigate adverse outcomes. The fundamental cause of disease approach argues that when a new screening tool is introduced, individuals with greater resources tend to have better access to the innovation, thus benefiting from early detection and leading to better survival. Conversely, when there is no established screening tool, racial and SES differences in early detection may be less pronounced. Most ovarian cancer is diagnosed at advanced stages, because of the lack of an effective screening tool and few early symptoms. However, once detected, racial differences may still be observed in mortality and survival outcomes. We examined the racial differences in diagnosis and survival among ovarian cancer cases diagnosed during 1994-1998, in Cook County, Illinois (N = 351). There were no racial differences in the stage at diagnosis: 51.7% of white and 52.9% of black women were diagnosed at later stages (III and IV). Only age was associated with the stage at diagnosis. Tumor characteristics also did not differ between white and black women. Compared to white women, black women were less likely to be married, less educated, more frequently used genital powder, had tubal ligation, and resided in higher poverty census tracts. As of December 31, 2005, 44.3% of white and 54.5% of black women had died of ovarian cancer. Controlling for known confounding variables, the hazard ratio for ovarian cancer death between black and white women was 2.2. The findings show that fundamental cause perspective provides a potential framework to explore subtleties in racial disparities, with which broader social causes may be accounted for in explaining post diagnosis racial differences.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesBlack or African AmericanBlack PeopleCarcinomaEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansIllinoisMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingOvarian NeoplasmsRisk FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsSurvival AnalysisWhite People

Identifiers

PMID20483517
PMCPMC3176671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.