Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20483320›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2010

Comparison between whole distribution- and average-based approaches to the determination of fluorescence resonance energy transfer efficiency in ensembles of proteins in living cells.

Deo R Singh, Valerică Raicu

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. FRET Assays for the Identification ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Deo R SinghDepartment of Physics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Valerică Raicu
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current methods for analysis of data from studies of protein-protein interactions using fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) emerged from several decades of research using wide-field microscopes and spectrofluorometers to measure fluorescence from individual cells or cell populations. Inherent to most measurements is an averaging of the distributions of FRET efficiencies over large populations of protein complexes, which washes out information regarding the stoichiometry and structure of protein complexes. Although the introduction of laser-scanning microscopes in principle could facilitate quantification of the distributions of FRET efficiencies in live cells, only comparatively recently did this potential fully materialize, through development of spectral- or lifetime-based approaches. To exploit this new opportunity in molecular imaging, it is necessary to further develop theoretical models and methods of data analysis. Using Monte Carlo simulations, we investigated FRET in homogenous and inhomogeneous spatial distributions of molecules. Our results indicate that an analysis based on distributions of FRET efficiencies presents significant advantages over the average-based approach, which include allowing for proper identification of biologically relevant FRET. This study provides insights into the effect of molecular crowding on FRET, and it offers a basis for information extraction from distributions of FRET efficiencies using simulations-based data fitting.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsCellsFluorescenceFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferFluorescent DyesMicroscopy, ConfocalMicroscopy, FluorescenceMolecular ImagingProteinsSpectrometry, FluorescenceBacterial ProteinsFluorescent DyesProteins

Identifiers

PMID20483320
PMCPMC2872365
OpenAlexW2024406707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.